[DNG] installation of Jessie 1.0 fails (busybox)

With Jessie 1.0 out, I decided to move from the beta as a system to play with to make Jessie 1.0 my primary system. I dd copied the DVD ISO to a 8 G USB key and booted it. I didn't expect to have any installation (expert) problems, but did. After having the partitioner format all partitions, I

Re: [DNG] Bash keyboard shortcuts working really ugly [SOLVED]

On 170526-14:52+0200, Alessandro Selli wrote: > On Thu, 25 May 2017 at 07:30:29 + > Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > > On 170525-06:51+0200, Alessandro Selli wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 May 2017 at 16:27:36 + Miroslav Rovis > > > wrote: >

Re: [DNG] scanner dependencies

Hendrik Boom writes: Sounds like sonething that should go into Devuan jessie as a bug fix. After someone tests it, of course. "Of course"... Which would you rather have, an untested fix or a known bug? IMNSHO that's an insidious question and neither a yes or a no is "of course" correct.

[DNG] scanner dependencies

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 01:55:51PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 08:16:28PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: > > Florian Zieboll writes: > > > IIRC, a sane developer had replied to that thread and said > > > that also saned just checks for the existence of libsystemd0 but does

Re: [DNG] trash

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 08:16:28PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: > Florian Zieboll writes: > > IIRC, a sane developer had replied to that thread and said > > that also saned just checks for the existence of libsystemd0 but does > > not need it at all. So the "dependency" is null and could be

Re: [DNG] trash

Hi, Florian Zieboll writes: > On Sun, 28 May 2017 09:17:05 -0400 > Hendrik Boom wrote: > >> The only one I have an idea what it's for is sane-utils. Presumably >> access to scanners. > > As mentioned on this list some days ago, sane-utils is not necessary to > run a