Re: [DNG] Gnome, KDE?

2017-06-13 Thread Steve Litt
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:45:19 +0200 Antony Stone wrote: > On Tuesday 13 June 2017 08:19:54 Jaromil wrote: > > but not GNOME! As with systemd, we are confident this won't hinder > > user's freedom of choice since one can always go use Ubuntu or > > Debian

Re: [DNG] Devuan ready VPS?

2017-06-13 Thread Emiliano Marini
I have finally migrated my first DigitalOcean droplet from Debian 7.11 Wheezy to Devuan 1.0 Jessie, and everything worked like a charm! Thank folks for encouraging me to do it ;) A production server on a Tuesday the 13th (it's the Friday the 13th for Latin Americans), call me crazy. The only

Re: [DNG] new dbus packages for ASCII in experimental -- PLEASE HELP TESTING

2017-06-13 Thread Massimiliano Baldinelli
On 2017-06-13 11:39, KatolaZ wrote: It would be great if somebody (better if "many-body" :P) could confirm whether an upgrade from the current ascii version to those packages is flawless or not. Ciao KatolaZ :) Since I use testing I'm just installing it to give it a try. What system info

Re: [DNG] human reaable package index

2017-06-13 Thread golinux
On 2017-06-13 06:59, aitor wrote: Hi, On 06/12/2017 12:00 PM, Jaromil wrote: On Sun, 11 Jun 2017, Hendrik Boom wrote: Debian has a useful page, https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages [1], which you get to via packages.debian.org Is there anything similar for devuan?

Re: [DNG] Gnome, KDE?

2017-06-13 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:45:19AM +0200, Antony Stone wrote: > > Is there a short answer (or can you point me at docs) to the question "what > makes a DE dependent on systemd?" > The decision by the developers to use its interfaces instead of the traditional ones. -- hendrik

Re: [DNG] Upgrades to testing... Is DebianBug#864043 relevant to us?

2017-06-13 Thread Tom Cassidy
On 10 June 2017 at 22:37, Hendrik Boom wrote: > This is in response to a bug on the Debian documenation mailing list, > but I'm replying to Devuan instead because some of it may be relevant > here. > > I'm particularly concerned by the sentence at the end: > > > But I

Re: [DNG] new dbus packages for ASCII in experimental -- PLEASE HELP TESTING

2017-06-13 Thread KatolaZ
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 01:10:37PM +0200, Irrwahn wrote: [cut] > > I can tell no difference in any behavior, all dbus related functionality > appears to work perfectly fine, no dependencies were broken during the > change. > > Oh, and gconf2 (which was also already installed, version

Re: [DNG] new dbus packages for ASCII in experimental -- PLEASE HELP TESTING

2017-06-13 Thread Irrwahn
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:16:41 +0100, Katolaz wrote: > Hi All, > > we have just built updated dbus packages for ascii. They are still in > experimental: > > deb http://packages.devuan.org/devuan/ experimental main > > and the current version number is 1.10.18-1+devuan2.2. This build > should

Re: [DNG] Gnome, KDE?

2017-06-13 Thread Antony Stone
On Tuesday 13 June 2017 08:19:54 Jaromil wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Antony Stone wrote: > > So, are Gnome and KDE currently still "known to suffer from some glitches > > due to the lack of systemd" (and if so, are these documented anywhere)? > > > > Or can these be expected to work as well as

Re: [DNG] Gnome, KDE?

2017-06-13 Thread Jaromil
hi Antony, On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Antony Stone wrote: > So, are Gnome and KDE currently still "known to suffer from some glitches due > to the lack of systemd" (and if so, are these documented anywhere)? > > Or can these be expected to work as well as XFCE, and as well as Debian > Jessie >