On 16/03/2018 at 00:14, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Nelson H. F. Beebe (be...@math.utah.edu):
>
>> I must rebut those statements.
>
> Edge-case obsess, much? ;->
> I'm delighted to have inspired you have disgorged this huge display of
> obscure geekery,
The ignorant peasant regularly claims
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 06:59:39PM +, leloft wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:17:58 +
> KatolaZ wrote:
>
> [...]
> >pinpoint any DSA whose patch is *not*
> > already available in Devuan
> [...]
>
> Ascii packages not yet replaced with patched versions
>
leloft,
On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:17:58 +
KatolaZ wrote:
[...]
>pinpoint any DSA whose patch is *not*
> already available in Devuan
[...]
Ascii packages not yet replaced with patched versions
Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:49:45 +
[SECURITY] [DSA 4135-1] samba security update
Need:
On 2018-03-16 04:40, KatolaZ wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 06:01:20PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
However, using a simple web search (using Duck Duck Go, if that
matters)
I cannot seem to easily find anything on a Devuan website that clearly
spells this out. Perhaps that is something
Postscript's imaging model is still the archetype, I look in the Red Book
or its descendents whenever I have to code 2-D imaging. They even explain
the matrix well. If you want something that *isn't* an interpretive
language, real PostScript interpreters also will print directly from PDF.
The
Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting wirelessd...@gmail.com (wirelessd...@gmail.com):
>
>> Seeing all the rage against non-PS printing here recently, I’m
>> wondering how PCL compares? Is it better/worse/equal to PostScript? Is
>> there any reason to prefer one over the other?
>
>
> By the way, when will anyone point out that printer-driver-hpcups
> might be enough for printing to non-ps HP printers and it doesn't need
> d-bus?
Being the original poster, I can confirm that CUPS+printer-driver-hpcups
worked for the printer in hand via JetDirect, without d-bus. I was
Am 16. März 2018 13:17:58 MEZ schrieb KatolaZ :
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:07:46PM +, leloft wrote:
>
> pinpoint any DSA whose patch is *not*
> already available in Devuan
Not willing to interfere with leloft's new task - just two relevant issues from
the past few
Quoting wirelessd...@gmail.com (wirelessd...@gmail.com):
> Seeing all the rage against non-PS printing here recently, I’m
> wondering how PCL compares? Is it better/worse/equal to PostScript? Is
> there any reason to prefer one over the other?
PCL printing is generally faster. In vague outline,
Seeing all the rage against non-PS printing here recently, I’m wondering how
PCL compares? Is it better/worse/equal to PostScript? Is there any reason to
prefer one over the other?
—Tom
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:07:46PM +, leloft wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 22:08:45 +
> KatolaZ wrote:
> Or maybe somebody here would like to take care of
> > putting together a summary of DSAs once a forthnight or so? That might
> > be useful.
>
> At last!
Wed, 31 Jan 2018 21:59:02 -0500
[SECURITY] [DSA 4103-1] chromium-browser security update
Sun, 04 Feb 2018 20:42:26 +
[SECURITY] [DSA 4104-1] p7zip security update
Fri, 9 Feb 2018 11:29:18 +0100
[SECURITY] [DSA 4108-1] mailman security update
Sat, 10 Feb 2018 02:35:38 +
[SECURITY] [DSA
Fri, 2 Mar 2018 07:15:39 +0100
[SECURITY] [DSA 4127-1] simplesamlphp security update
Fri, 02 Mar 2018 16:23:54 +
[SECURITY] [DSA 4128-1] trafficserver security update
Fri, 2 Mar 2018 21:42:04 +0100
[SECURITY] [DSA 4129-1] freexl security update
Fri, 02 Mar 2018 22:28:08 +
[SECURITY]
Thu, 15 Feb 2018 07:04:58 +
[SECURITY] [DSA 4114-1] jackson-databind security update
Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:25:18 +
[SECURITY] [DSA 4115-1] quagga security update
Fri, 16 Feb 2018 21:46:33 +0100
[SECURITY] [DSA 4116-1] plasma-workspace security update
Sat, 17 Feb 2018 13:58:43 +
Fri, 2 Mar 2018 07:15:39 +0100
[SECURITY] [DSA 4127-1] simplesamlphp security update
Fri, 2 Mar 2018 21:42:04 +0100
[SECURITY] [DSA 4129-1] freexl security update
Fri, 02 Mar 2018 22:28:08 +
[SECURITY] [DSA 4130-1] dovecot security update
Sun, 4 Mar 2018 11:00:13 +0100
[SECURITY] [DSA
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 22:08:45 +
KatolaZ wrote:
Or maybe somebody here would like to take care of
> putting together a summary of DSAs once a forthnight or so? That might
> be useful.
At last! Something I can do!
leloft
___
Thu, 15 Feb 2018 07:04:58 +
[SECURITY] [DSA 4114-1] jackson-databind security update
Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:25:18 +
[SECURITY] [DSA 4115-1] quagga security update
Sat, 17 Feb 2018 14:36:42 +0100
[SECURITY] [DSA 4117-1] gcc-4.9 security update
Sat, 17 Feb 2018 13:58:43 +
[SECURITY] [DSA
Wed, 14 Feb 2018 22:41:24 +0100
[SECURITY] [DSA 4113-1] libvorbis security update
Wed, 31 Jan 2018 21:59:02 -0500
[SECURITY] [DSA 4103-1] chromium-browser security update
Sun, 04 Feb 2018 20:42:26 +
[SECURITY] [DSA 4104-1] p7zip security update
Wed, 07 Feb 2018 02:49:21 +
[SECURITY]
On 15.03.18 22:08, KatolaZ wrote:
> FYI
>
> As many of us, I keep receiving DSAs. And as usual, we should be
> covered on these ones. If you think it might be useful, I might
> forward DSAs here. Or maybe somebody here would like to take care of
> putting together a summary of DSAs once a
On 16.03.18 08:40, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 06:41:50PM -0600, Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote:
> > In PostScript, I don't readily find any built-in operators that could
> > give a result that differs on every run, so you probably have to
>
> [cut]
>
> Yes, that's the problem. And that,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 06:01:20PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Hi KatolaZ,
>
> KatolaZ writes:
>
> > As many of us, I keep receiving DSAs. And as usual, we should be
> > covered on these ones. If you think it might be useful, I might
> > forward DSAs here. Or maybe somebody here would like
Hi Didier,
Didier Kryn writes:
> Le 16/03/2018 à 09:19, Olaf Meeuwissen a écrit:
>>> This is getting off the topic in the subject line, [...]
>> Indeed;-)
>>
>>> In PostScript, I don't readily find any built-in operators that could
>>> give a result that differs on every run, so you probably
Hi KatolaZ,
KatolaZ writes:
> As many of us, I keep receiving DSAs. And as usual, we should be
> covered on these ones. If you think it might be useful, I might
> forward DSAs here. Or maybe somebody here would like to take care of
> putting together a summary of DSAs once a forthnight or so?
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 06:41:50PM -0600, Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote:
[cut]
>
> In PostScript, I don't readily find any built-in operators that could
> give a result that differs on every run, so you probably have to
[cut]
Yes, that's the problem. And that, AFAIK, you don't have a way to read
Hi,
Joel Roth writes:
> Cups was sponsored by Apple, [...]
Correction, Apple bought CUPS in February 2007 after they adopted it for
inclusion in MacOS X in March 2002[1].
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUPS#History
Hope this helps,
--
Olaf Meeuwissen, LPIC-2FSF Associate
Le 16/03/2018 à 09:19, Olaf Meeuwissen a écrit :
This is getting off the topic in the subject line, [...]
Indeed;-)
In PostScript, I don't readily find any built-in operators that could
give a result that differs on every run, so you probably have to
inject suitable arguments for srand from
Nelson H. F. Bee:
...
> For more on PostScript and PDF, see the extensive bibliography at
>
> http://www.math.utah.edu/pub/tex/bib/postscri.bib
Thank you for all the references.
> As an example of differences between the two markup languages, look at
> the book in entry
27 matches
Mail list logo