Quoting Haines Brown (hai...@histomat.net):
> With a sector of 512 bytes, it fat32 is apparently limit to 2 Tb. I'm
> unclear whether a limit on the number of files becomes a problem. Vfat
> might be analternative.
VFAT _is_ FAT32, just with a very dodgy long-filename extension.
Of possible
Quoting Simon Hobson (li...@thehobsons.co.uk):
> I have a suggestion ...
> Create a small partition in NTFS or Fat, and put some files on there
> saying what else is on the drive - and some hints on how to access it.
Well, and (assuming this drive is in an external case) attach ruggedly
to the
Haines Brown wrote:
> I left the drive NTFS because I wanted easy access to the drive for folks
> (granschildren) who do not run Linux.
>
> Othersie I prefer ext4. When you say NTFS is slower, to you mean three times
> slower (which I am experiencing) or a bit slower?
In my experience, as
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 03:04:12PM -0400, Haines Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 05:33:16PM +0100, g4sra via Dng wrote:
> >
> > My bad, changed from '#!/bin/bash' syntax to '#!/bin/sh'
> >
> > # this must follow immediately after the mount command
> > if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> > echo
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 05:33:16PM +0100, g4sra via Dng wrote:
>
> My bad, changed from '#!/bin/bash' syntax to '#!/bin/sh'
>
> # this must follow immediately after the mount command
> if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> echo "Mount Failed!"
> exit 1
> fi
I'll give it a try. Thanks.
> Easy access to
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 01:38:57PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 12:02:37PM -0400, Haines Brown wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 12:11:46AM +0200, Harald Arnesen via Dng wrote:
> > > Haines Brown [07.08.2020 18:19]:
> > >
> > > > Yes, for sure. If you are right about the
On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 01:00 +0200, marc...@welz.org.za wrote:
> The concern about using any gratis commercial videoconferencing
> service is that quite a bit of biometric information can be
> collected from you - in particular your voice and your face.
> Your personal files are just a bonus.
>
On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 15:39 -0400, Haines Brown wrote:
> I've installed the .deb file on my bewowulf 3 deskotop. It seems
> like it would work. I'll give it try next time ther is a zoom
> meeting.
>
If you go into settings you should be able to see if zoom is connecting
to your webcam (see
On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 15:39 -0400, Haines Brown wrote:
>
> I've installed the .deb file on my bewowulf 3 deskotop. It seems
> like it would work. I'll give it try next time ther is a zoom
> meeting.
>
> Incidenttally is there a public site that one can use to test zoom?
>
> I gave up trying to
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 12:02:37PM -0400, Haines Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 12:11:46AM +0200, Harald Arnesen via Dng wrote:
> > Haines Brown [07.08.2020 18:19]:
> >
> > > Yes, for sure. If you are right about the speed difference between
> > > NTFS and ext4, then is there another FS
On 09/08/2020 16:55, Haines Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 02:53:13PM +0100, g4sra via Dng wrote:
>> 3) abort if the mount fails
>> [ $? -eq 0 ] || {echo "Mount Failed!"; exit 1;}
>
> I put this line into my backup script and only got a syntax error.
My bad, changed from '#!/bin/bash'
On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 12:11:46AM +0200, Harald Arnesen via Dng wrote:
> Haines Brown [07.08.2020 18:19]:
>
> > Yes, for sure. If you are right about the speed difference between
> > NTFS and ext4, then is there another FS that can be accessed by a
> > Windows machine that is not much slower
On Sat, Aug 08, 2020 at 02:53:13PM +0100, g4sra via Dng wrote:
> On 07/08/2020 21:01, Haines Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 06:34:04PM +0100, g4sra wrote:
> >
> >> Post your backup script for others to look over.
> >
> >
> > #!/bin/bash
> >
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 04:17:06PM -0400, Curtis Maurand via Dng wrote:
> I just mounted up an NTFS mount on my Ascii desktop. It loaded up fairly
> quickly. Any other operation such as opening a folder with a lot of entries
> took a very long time. This is on a Seagate Baracuda 1TB plugged
Hi Emiliano,
On 7/8/20 3:04, Ludovic Bellière wrote:
Thus, you'll have to switch from consolekit to
elogind if you wish to use anything KDE.
If you don't want to mix so many Qt dependecies with Gtk stuff,
you can use the images of gnuinoslxqt, built a couple of days ago
including gwenview:
On 09.08.20 02:31, terryc wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Aug 2020 00:33:00 -0500
> John Morris wrote:
>
> Snipping the Pol, Para and not mentioning Cap.
>
>> Or like people who still run Windows after
>> decades of failure and breathtaking security flaws, but they just know
>> the next release is going to
16 matches
Mail list logo
