Quoting Mark Rousell (mark.rous...@signal100.com):
> Option 1 is a bit embarrassing if anyone notices (e.g.
> "host-46462.static.bugtown.myisp.net" isn't too cool as the name of your
> mail server) but I don't see any technical downside, although DMARC
> might perhaps be an issue nowadays.
DMARC
On Thu, 2020-09-24 at 17:32 +0100, Mark Rousell wrote:
> On 24/09/2020 13:43, Jim Jackson wrote:
>
>
>
> > Mostly. Somemail servers do a reverse IP lookup and see if it
> > matches your envelope From domain.
> >
>
> Yes, this is an annoyance. There are two ways round
On 24/09/2020 16:40, Simon Hobson wrote:
>
> But if you do "accept then bin", you can scale your resources for more
> average rates and just let messages sit in a queue for a few minutes when
> things are really busy. Given the resources available to MS and Google (to
> name just two), that's no
On 24/09/2020 13:43, Jim Jackson wrote:
> Mostly. Somemail servers do a reverse IP lookup and see if it matches your
> envelope From domain.
Yes, this is an annoyance. There are two ways round this: (1) Change
your server's SMTP From domain to be the same as your static IP's PTR
hostname, and (2
Mark Rousell wrote:
>> But once you accept a
>> message with a success status after the DATA stage, you are obliged to
>> either really deliver it or else bounce it back. It is not acceptable to
>> send messages down a "black hole".
> This *should* not be acceptable (and it's very annoying if yo
On 24-09-2020 14:43, Jim Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2020, Mark Rousell wrote:
>
>> On 24/09/2020 07:30, Dimitris via Dng wrote:
>>> in my opinion a home connection server smtp+imap/pop will not be very
>>> usable. most rbl's block dynamic addresses so you won't be able to
>>> deliver much...
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020, Mark Rousell wrote:
> On 24/09/2020 07:30, Dimitris via Dng wrote:
> >
> > in my opinion a home connection server smtp+imap/pop will not be very
> > usable. most rbl's block dynamic addresses so you won't be able to
> > deliver much...
>
> In some areas (e.g. the UK), the b
On 24/09/2020 11:14, Mark Rousell wrote:
On 24/09/2020 07:30, Dimitris via Dng wrote:
in my opinion a home connection server smtp+imap/pop will not be very
usable. most rbl's block dynamic addresses so you won't be able to
deliver much...
In some areas (e.g. the UK), the better ISPs provi
On 24/09/2020 07:30, Dimitris via Dng wrote:
>
> in my opinion a home connection server smtp+imap/pop will not be very
> usable. most rbl's block dynamic addresses so you won't be able to
> deliver much...
In some areas (e.g. the UK), the better ISPs provide static IPs so this
issue is bypassed.
On 23/09/2020 20:13, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> But once you accept a
> message with a success status after the DATA stage, you are obliged to
> either really deliver it or else bounce it back. It is not acceptable to
> send messages down a "black hole".
This *should* not be acceptable (and it's ver
On 23/09/2020 02:32, DECbot wrote:
> Since my ISP is the devil and blocks port 25, I'm using autossh to
> forward port 25 traffic to a $5/month vps.
Do you have difficulty with your outgoing SMTP being blocked (often
silently swallowed, from what I've seen) to certain large mail services
using thi
11 matches
Mail list logo