JVM often depends on X11 libs.
вт, 29 сент. 2020 г., 7:49 Gregory Nowak :
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:57:07PM -0400, tempforever via Dng wrote:
> > I manage a few remote servers that are running Devuan. Recently (last
> > week) I noticed a couple updates to some x11 libraries. I went ahead
>
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:57:07PM -0400, tempforever via Dng wrote:
> I manage a few remote servers that are running Devuan. Recently (last
> week) I noticed a couple updates to some x11 libraries. I went ahead
> and updated. But now, I'm wondering if it's okay to remove them
> altogether? I
I manage a few remote servers that are running Devuan. Recently (last
week) I noticed a couple updates to some x11 libraries. I went ahead
and updated. But now, I'm wondering if it's okay to remove them
altogether? I do not use any graphical user interface on them. I only
connect via ssh, and
On 9/26/20 3:09 AM, Budi via Dng wrote:
> Did download this:
> [b]devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso[/b]
> (1.2GB)
>
> and did:
> [code]sudo dd if=devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso
> of=/dev/sdc bs=4096[/code]
>
> did reboot it, but got sort of this output:
>
> Error : cannot
On Sun 27/Sep/2020 20:11:39 +0200 Simon Hobson wrote:
Alessandro Vesely via Dng wrote:
[...]
And it is key to get an IP address without poorly reputed neighbors —check
talosintelligence.com.
I have no choice over the neighbours !
Don't buy overly cheap connections...
I also use lack
On 28/09/2020 02:29, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:35:55AM +0200, aitor_czr wrote:
>> On 27/9/20 13:59, g4sra via Dng wrote:
>>> I have reservations about where QT5 is going, despite any issue with
>>> pulseaudio, now might be a good time to jump ship.
>
> I've been wondering
There is a growing schism between the Qt Company and the opensource
community.
The Qt Company published a blog post
(https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-offering-changes-2020) reading:
> From February onward, everyone, including open-source Qt users, will require
> valid Qt accounts to download Qt binary
On 9/28/20 11:55 AM, terryc wrote:
> Does anyone have any figures on how effective these methods are?
> It seems we get a new idea every few years and none make the slightest
> difference in spam levels.
we use all these + custom SA scores for related rules and seen great
decline in spam levels.
terryc wrote:
>> You can also publish DKIM and SPF records so as to produce
>> DMARC-aligned authentication for any hosted domain. Users won't
>> notice any difference.
>
> Does anyone have any figures on how effective these methods are?
> It seems we get a new idea every few years and none
Hi,
Ian Zimmerman writes:
> On 2020-09-26 18:29, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
>
>> did you do a "sync" afterwards and waited till it returned? If not,
>> then the image was not written completely. You can monitor the writing
>> process with "watch iostat" (if you have sysstat installed)
>
> Or run
On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 17:20:06 +0200
Alessandro Vesely via Dng wrote:
> You can also publish DKIM and SPF records so as to produce
> DMARC-aligned authentication for any hosted domain. Users won't
> notice any difference.
Does anyone have any figures on how effective these methods are?
It seems
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>> You mean, like in the web hosting days before hostname headers where
>> you needed a different IP address for each hosted domain name ? That's
>> very 20th century and not a luxury most of us have.
>
> FWIW, Linode (where my sole server is hosted) gives me a /64 IPv6
On 28/9/20 8:31, aitor_czr wrote:
The above issues have been fixed and the packages are available in:
deb http://packages.gnuinos.org/merged beowulf main
deb-src http://packages.gnuinos.org/merged beowulf main
You need gnuinos-keyring.
Aitor.
Hi again,
On 6/4/20 0:43, aitor_czr wrote:
Hi Mike,
On 4/5/20 8:20 PM, Mike Schmitz via Dng wrote:
One thing I ran into right away, and took me a few tries before I
figured it out; I needed to quote my passphrase, since it has spaces. It
might be good to do that in your call to
14 matches
Mail list logo
