On 9/9/22 3:24 am, Simon Hobson wrote:
Marjorie Roome via Dng wrote:
I configure strict postfix rules that incoming mail should have a
reverse DNS.
I find grey-listing to be by far the most effective spam blocker.
I use postscreen rather than grey-listing. It does much the same delay
Marjorie Roome via Dng wrote:
> I configure strict postfix rules that incoming mail should have a
> reverse DNS.
Ah, we’re talking two different checks. I too reject connections if there’s no
reverse DNS, but ideally that reverse DNS should forward resolve to a list (one
or more IPs)
On Thu, 2022-09-08 at 11:29 +, jkinne...@yahoo.ca wrote:
> Would anyone have the infrastructure to help us less advantaged FOSS
> advocates
> who got trampled on by big tech and the pandemic with the appropriate email
> address
> to stay involved in the discussion if this experiment happens?
Would anyone have the infrastructure to help us less advantaged FOSS advocates
who got trampled on by big tech and the pandemic with the appropriate email
address
to stay involved in the discussion if this experiment happens? I just got here
and I
love it. I'd otherwise need a bit more time if
On Thu, 2022-09-08 at 10:29 +0200, marc wrote:
>
> I am considering starting an admin list, where one can only
> subscribe with an address starting with admin@... and
> perhaps only one admin@... per IP.
I suggest a name other than admin@, because people are probably using admin@
for
other
Gregory Nowak was quoted by Simon Hobson:
> > I have toyed more than once with the question of what would happen if
> > a group of us running our own mail exchanges made the choice to
> > reject mail from gmail.com with a 550? If a few of us did it, we might
> > miss mail we maybe wanted to get.
Hi Simon,
On Sun, 2022-09-04 at 21:22 +0100, Simon Hobson wrote:
> declassed art via Dng wrote:
>
> > I do have an unconfigured PTR for a couple of reasons, one
> > of those is lack of static IP for now.
>
> I figured out quite quickly that checking reverse DNS is a waste of
> time - too many
> Maybe related news, and some more reading:
>
> https://www.jwz.org/blog/2022/08/today-in-google-broke-email/
No, it is not related, he just needs to get SRS implemented.
Regards, Adrian.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
declassed art via Dng wrote:
> I do have an unconfigured PTR for a couple of reasons, one of those is lack
> of static IP for now.
I figured out quite quickly that checking reverse DNS is a waste of time - too
many systems, even those run by professional network/server engineers, are just
On Fri 02/Sep/2022 22:09:27 +0200 marc wrote:
But look here: This is the sending host for the DNG mailing list:
Received: from mail.dyne.org (ns3218761.ip-162-19-139.eu [162.19.139.95])
I think OVH allows classless delegation or at least setting PTRs for fixed
IPs. I'd guess it's laziness
Hello
> >But look here: This is the sending host for the DNG mailing list:
> >
> > Received: from mail.dyne.org (ns3218761.ip-162-19-139.eu [162.19.139.95])
>
>
> I think OVH allows classless delegation or at least setting PTRs for fixed
> IPs. I'd guess it's laziness the reason why it isn't
On Thu 01/Sep/2022 23:22:13 +0200 marc wrote:
It's imperative that you have rdns, spf, dkim and dmarc set up and that it all matches.
My MTA will reject you if your ptr doesn't match your a record and your helo/ehlo hostname. spf, dkim and dmarc are all scored via spamassassin. Google
On 01-09-2022 23:46, marc wrote:
Hello
I use gmail, and seem to be getting email from this list. I wonder if it
is because I have it skip the inbox, and go straight into a different
label.
I think you are on to something: It could well be that there has been a shift
to using how the
On 2022-08-31 10:04, Curtis Maurand wrote:
I’ve been running my own MTA for 15+ years. occasionally I get
bounced. recently was bounced by sbcglobal (AT) who doesn’t respond
to removal requests. It’s definitely a PITA. However, in all
fairness, I was sending to a large group (25 or so)and that
Hello
> I use gmail, and seem to be getting email from this list. I wonder if it
> is because I have it skip the inbox, and go straight into a different
> label.
I think you are on to something: It could well be that there has been a shift
to using how the recipients organise their gmail (do you
Hello
> It???s imperative that you have rdns, spf, dkim and dmarc set up and that it
> all matches.
>
> My MTA will reject you if your ptr doesn???t match your a record and your
> helo/ehlo hostname. spf, skim and dmarc are all scored via spamassassin.
> Google rejects, outright, if there
On Thu 01/Sep/2022 18:33:48 +0200 Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 11:30:43AM +1000, onefang wrote:
The problem with PTRs is that I run several domains from the one IP
address, and PTR can only point to one of those. It costs money to get
more IPs, my pension is barely coping with
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 11:30:43AM +1000, onefang wrote:
>
> The problem with PTRs is that I run several domains from the one IP
> address, and PTR can only point to one of those. It costs money to get
> more IPs, my pension is barely coping with the recent cost of living
> increases.
If IP's
On 2022-08-31 11:04:51, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Aug 31, 2022, at 10:39 AM, marc wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Just a quick note that in the last week or so google seems
> > have ratcheted up its rejection of mail from independent MTAs
> > a notch or two.
> >
>
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:14:31AM +0200, marc wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just a quick note that in the last week or so google seems
> have ratcheted up its rejection of mail from independent MTAs
> a notch or two.
>
> IF you check your logs, you might see 550 rejects with a message
> such as
>
> Our
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 09:14:31AM +0200, marc wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just a quick note that in the last week or so google seems
> have ratcheted up its rejection of mail from independent MTAs
> a notch or two.
>
> IF you check your logs, you might see 550 rejects with a message
> such as
>
> Our
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 31, 2022, at 10:39 AM, marc wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Just a quick note that in the last week or so google seems
> have ratcheted up its rejection of mail from independent MTAs
> a notch or two.
>
> IF you check your logs, you might see 550 rejects with a message
>
I do have an unconfigured PTR for a couple of reasons, one of those is lack
of static IP for now. But I never had problems with gmail. Instead, I have
problems with this list which rejects my messages sent from my own MTA
because they cannot find a hostname for my IP. So I have to post from my
Hi
Just a quick note that in the last week or so google seems
have ratcheted up its rejection of mail from independent MTAs
a notch or two.
IF you check your logs, you might see 550 rejects with a message
such as
Our system has detected that this message is likely
unsolicited mail. To
24 matches
Mail list logo
