Re: [DNG] Another problem you won't have without Systemd (or separate oomd)

2022-08-23 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 08:33:45AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 05:31:58PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote: > > Le 20/08/2022 à 10:20, Martin Steigerwald a écrit : > > > oomd may make sense in certain cloud based workloads, maybe, just maybe. > > > However… on a desktop? You are fr

Re: [DNG] Another problem you won't have without Systemd (or separate oomd)

2022-08-23 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 05:31:58PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote: > Le 20/08/2022 à 10:20, Martin Steigerwald a écrit : > > oomd may make sense in certain cloud based workloads, maybe, just maybe. > > However… on a desktop? You are frigging kidding me, aren't you? > >     Well, it can happen to anybody

Re: [DNG] Another problem you won't have without Systemd (or separate oomd)

2022-08-22 Thread d...@d404.nl
On 22-08-2022 17:31, Didier Kryn wrote: Le 20/08/2022 à 10:20, Martin Steigerwald a écrit : oomd may make sense in certain cloud based workloads, maybe, just maybe. However… on a desktop? You are frigging kidding me, aren't you?     Well, it can happen to anybody to write an application which

Re: [DNG] Another problem you won't have without Systemd (or separate oomd)

2022-08-22 Thread Didier Kryn
Le 20/08/2022 à 10:20, Martin Steigerwald a écrit : oomd may make sense in certain cloud based workloads, maybe, just maybe. However… on a desktop? You are frigging kidding me, aren't you?     Well, it can happen to anybody to write an application which leaks memory. The oom killer is automati

Re: [DNG] Another problem you won't have without Systemd (or separate oomd)

2022-08-20 Thread Steve Litt
On Sat, 2022-08-20 at 10:20 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi! > > You cannot make this up, can you? > > Bug 2119518 - GNOME being OOM killed during basic use on VM with 2G of > RAM > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119518 Martin, after reading this, I think it's not a bug

Re: [DNG] Another problem you won't have without Systemd (or separate oomd)

2022-08-20 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen via Dng
Hi, Martin Steigerwald writes: > Hi! > > You cannot make this up, can you? > > Bug 2119518 - GNOME being OOM killed during basic use on VM with 2G of > RAM > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119518 Reading through the bug report it looks a lot like someone got their maths wrong. I

[DNG] Another problem you won't have without Systemd (or separate oomd)

2022-08-20 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hi! You cannot make this up, can you? Bug 2119518 - GNOME being OOM killed during basic use on VM with 2G of RAM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119518 It still seems to be that people think adding complexity comes without risk of malfunction. oomd may make sense in certain clo