Re: [DNG] Broken packages in Ascii, how to fix? (Beware of Debian Stretch) WAS: devuan packages explorer

2017-07-05 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 170705-10:25+0100, KatolaZ wrote: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 04:15:11AM +, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > [cut] > > > > > t@gdOv:/home/mr# ls -l /etc/apt/ > > total 32 > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 283 2017-07-03 18:15 apt.conf > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2017-06-29 19:48 apt.conf.d > >

Re: [DNG] Broken packages in Ascii, how to fix? (Beware of Debian Stretch) WAS: devuan packages explorer

2017-07-05 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 170705-11:06+0200, Edward Bartolo wrote: > Hi, > > During the last week or so, I had VLC broken on ASCII. > > The solution to get back VLC working was to manually inspect the > installed VLC dependencies for their version numbers. I compared those > numbers with what an installation

Re: [DNG] Broken packages in Ascii, how to fix? (Beware of Debian Stretch) WAS: devuan packages explorer

2017-07-05 Thread KatolaZ
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 08:46:04AM +, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > This is just correcting the subject line, and if there are no replies, > withdrawing. > > Widrawing to dev1galaxy.org forums: > Broken packages in Ascii, how to fix? (Beware of Debian Stretch) >

Re: [DNG] Broken packages in Ascii, how to fix? (Beware of Debian Stretch) WAS: devuan packages explorer

2017-07-05 Thread Edward Bartolo
Hi, During the last week or so, I had VLC broken on ASCII. The solution to get back VLC working was to manually inspect the installed VLC dependencies for their version numbers. I compared those numbers with what an installation simulation of vlc proposed as dependency versions. Doing that, I

[DNG] Broken packages in Ascii, how to fix? (Beware of Debian Stretch) WAS: devuan packages explorer

2017-07-05 Thread Miroslav Rovis
This is just correcting the subject line, and if there are no replies, withdrawing. Widrawing to dev1galaxy.org forums: Broken packages in Ascii, how to fix? (Beware of Debian Stretch) https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=1115 On 170705-04:15+, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > On