Hi Dave,
Cc:ing this to the list again, hope you don't mind.
Dave Turner writes:
> On 29/11/17 11:07, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Dave Turner writes:
>>
>>> On 27/11/17 21:58, Rowland Penny wrote:
Hi, a guy has just asked a question on the samba mailing list about
Hi Dave,
Dave Turner writes:
> On 27/11/17 21:58, Rowland Penny wrote:
>> Hi, a guy has just asked a question on the samba mailing list about
>> apparmor and Samba, it seems that last week, apparmor became a
>> dependency for the kernel on Buster, because of systemd.
>>
>> Can I take it this
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:58:40PM +, Rowland Penny wrote:
>
> Hi, a guy has just asked a question on the samba mailing list about
> apparmor and Samba, it seems that last week, apparmor became a
> dependency for the kernel on Buster, because of systemd.
Uhh, it's no dependency, merely a
Hi, a guy has just asked a question on the samba mailing list about
apparmor and Samba, it seems that last week, apparmor became a
dependency for the kernel on Buster, because of systemd.
Can I take it this dependency will be removed in Beowulf ?
Rowland
