Le 29/07/2017 à 09:41, Olaf Meeuwissen a écrit :
Hi,
Didier Kryn writes:
In an ideal word, software would have
- maximum performance
- minimum resource usage
- minimum of dangerous bugs
In an ideal world, software would have *no* bugs ;-)
And zero resource usage
On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 16:41:01 +0900
Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> > In an ideal word, software would have
> >
> > - maximum performance
> > - minimum resource usage
> > - minimum of dangerous bugs
>
> In an ideal world, software would have *no* bugs
Hi,
Didier Kryn writes:
> In an ideal word, software would have
>
> - maximum performance
> - minimum resource usage
> - minimum of dangerous bugs
In an ideal world, software would have *no* bugs ;-)
> - easy maintainability
> - fast development
> - what
Le 27/07/2017 à 16:18, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult a écrit :
On 27.07.2017 08:22, Didier Kryn wrote:
At first glance at least, it means that file offsets are managed in the
kernel or VFS
Of course they are. That's required for any sane multiprocessing
implementation. And some
On 27.07.2017 08:22, Didier Kryn wrote:
At first glance at least, it means that file offsets are managed in the
kernel or VFS
Of course they are. That's required for any sane multiprocessing
implementation. And some files/devices don't even have the notion
of a current position (IOW: not
Le 26/07/2017 à 22:00, Christopher Clements a écrit :
Wouldn't this work? (no error checking of course XD)
off_t lseek(int fd, off_t offset, int whence);
ssize_t write(int fd, const void *buf, size_t count);
ssize_t pwrite(int fd, const void *buf, size_t count, off_t
offset) {