Quoting Gabe Stanton via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> I'll be blunt as well. I think this argument is a strawman because you
> lumped opennic in with other dns providers and dismissed them
That is not what I said.
Your reading comprehension isssues are not my problem.
> > > You made a case
On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 17:10 +, Simon Hobson wrote:
> Gabe Stanton via Dng wrote:
>
> > You're right that I didn't address the fact that queries to root
> > servers don't all go to one server. My understanding of that wasn't
> > firm when I was writing so I said 'upstream server'. But that
Gabe Stanton via Dng wrote:
> You're right that I didn't address the fact that queries to root
> servers don't all go to one server. My understanding of that wasn't
> firm when I was writing so I said 'upstream server'. But that would be
> a small hurdle to overcome if everyone started
On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 13:14 +, Simon Hobson wrote:
> Gabe Stanton via Dng wrote:
>
> > Of course using a local (or controlled by you) caching dns resolver
> > ENHANCES privacy. That's not even a question and doesn't represent
> > a
> > real argument against the likelihood that, in the case
Gabe Stanton via Dng wrote:
> Of course using a local (or controlled by you) caching dns resolver
> ENHANCES privacy. That's not even a question and doesn't represent a
> real argument against the likelihood that, in the case of everyone
> running their own caching resolver, that second level
On Wed, 2021-03-10 at 20:04 -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Gabe Stanton via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
> > Of course using a local (or controlled by you) caching dns resolver
> > ENHANCES privacy.
>
> You really should have stopped there.
>
> > That's not even a question and doesn't
Quoting Gabe Stanton via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> Of course using a local (or controlled by you) caching dns resolver
> ENHANCES privacy.
You really should have stopped there.
> That's not even a question and doesn't represent a
> real argument against the likelihood that, in the case of
On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 22:26 -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Gabe Stanton via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
> > In the absence of a "community of dns server operators and users",
> > is
> > the optimal option to have everyone run their own recursive server?
> > But
> > then the upstream servers
Redirecting this thread back to the list. See below q and a between
Steve and me.
On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 09:16 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 06:40 -0700, Gabe Stanton via Dng wrote:
> > Oh, and one more thing since you mentioned icann, one thing to note
> > is
> > that
