Re: [DNG] RFC: minimal-live iso changes for chimaera

2021-07-21 Thread Bernard Rosset via Dng
I've used transmission in the past but currently use deluge. Both have a gui, whereas AFAIR them as relatively klunky. YMMV. I have been a user of Transmission for years, because license, features and history talk for it. I just checked Deluge on those and it seems decent too (despite the

Re: [DNG] RFC: minimal-live iso changes for chimaera

2021-07-20 Thread fsmithred via Dng
On 7/20/21 11:15 AM, terryc wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:46:09 -0400 > fsmithred via Dng wrote: > >> The following packages are not in chimaera. I'm removing them from the >> minimal-live isos so that they will build successfully. >> >> Suggestions for replacement packages are welcome. >> >>

Re: [DNG] RFC: minimal-live iso changes for chimaera

2021-07-20 Thread terryc
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:46:09 -0400 fsmithred via Dng wrote: > The following packages are not in chimaera. I'm removing them from the > minimal-live isos so that they will build successfully. > > Suggestions for replacement packages are welcome. > > bittornado > termsaver I don't know about

Re: [DNG] RFC: minimal-live iso changes for chimaera

2021-07-20 Thread Ludovic Bellière via Dng
Hello fsmithred. * termsaver:: is kind of a joke software, hasn't been a release since 2014 even though it has been updated to circumvent the reason of removal from debian. No real alternative either. * bittornado:: unmaintained. Good alternative would be transmission. If a cli client is

[DNG] RFC: minimal-live iso changes for chimaera

2021-07-20 Thread fsmithred via Dng
The following packages are not in chimaera. I'm removing them from the minimal-live isos so that they will build successfully. Suggestions for replacement packages are welcome. bittornado termsaver Thanks, fsmithred ___ Dng mailing list