Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-12 Thread Mark Hindley
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:12:32PM +, Mark Hindley wrote: > > $ w > > 01:55:37 up 4 min, 1 user, load average: 0.21, 0.19, 0.09 > > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT > > user :0.0 :0.0 01:51 ?xdm? 47.32s 0.24s > > x-session-manager

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-10 Thread Mark Hindley
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 02:03:11AM +0200, Dimitris via Dng wrote: > On 3/8/19 10:04 PM, Mark Hindley wrote: > > Would people who are experiencing missing slim utmp entries mind trying > > again > > with the following configuration added to /etc/slim.conf, please? > > > > sessionstop_cmd exec

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-09 Thread Dimitris via Dng
On 3/8/19 10:04 PM, Mark Hindley wrote: > Would people who are experiencing missing slim utmp entries mind trying again > with the following configuration added to /etc/slim.conf, please? > > sessionstop_cmd exec /usr/bin/sessreg -d -l $DISPLAY %user > sessionstart_cmd exec /usr/bin/sessreg -a -l

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-09 Thread fsmithred via Dng
On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 08:37:03 +0100 aitor_czr wrote: > My latest image of gnuinos beowulf (not uploaded yet) waits for a > keyboard press event during live boots. If openssh-server is installed, it's waiting for entropy. Install haveged and make sure it starts before ssh. I made a modified

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-09 Thread aitor_czr
Hi, On 9/3/19 8:37, aitor_czr wrote: My latest image of gnuinos beowulf (not uploaded yet) waits for a keyboard press event during live boots. I'm still not sure if this is related with the new version of slim. I'll check it soon. Another possible cause might be the non configured live-config

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-08 Thread aitor_czr
Hi, On 7/3/19 14:31, KatolaZ wrote: On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:13:01AM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote: Is beowulf already in a state where it is generally useable for an ordinary user on a laptop? Except maybe a few quirks like the one we're now debugging? If so I'll upgrade soon and look for

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-08 Thread Mark Hindley
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:31:33AM +1100, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > So, apparently 'slim' since long ago believes something else is > responsible for registring the session(s), but that something else > doesn't agree. Would people who are experiencing missing slim utmp entries mind trying

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Hendrik Boom (hend...@topoi.pooq.com): > Is beowulf already in a state where it is generally useable for an ordinary > user on a laptop? Simple solution: Define yourself to be extraordinary. ;-> -- Cheers, I could maybe do one pilate. Rick

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 02:31:06PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:13:01AM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > [cut] > > > > > Is beowulf already in a state where it is generally useable for an ordinary > > user on a laptop? Except maybe a few quirks like the one we're now > >

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Dimitris via Dng
>> You are right that elogind doesn't seem to be updating lastlog. submitted bug report #302 minutes ago. thanks, d. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread KatolaZ
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:13:01AM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote: [cut] > > Is beowulf already in a state where it is generally useable for an ordinary > user on a laptop? Except maybe a few quirks like the one we're now > debugging? If so I'll upgrade soon and look for problems. I'd prefer

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 01:58:03PM +0100, Antony Stone wrote: > On Thursday 07 March 2019 at 13:27:10, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:43:05AM +1100, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > > > > > > Does anyone else have bogus 'w'/'last' reports? > > > > How does one obtain

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Antony Stone
On Thursday 07 March 2019 at 13:27:10, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:43:05AM +1100, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > > > > Does anyone else have bogus 'w'/'last' reports? > > How does one obtain 'w'/'last' reports? 1. Type "w"; you should get something like: # w 12:55:35

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:43:05AM +1100, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > > > KatolaZ wrote on 7/3/19 9:30 am: > > Bug report to bugs.devuan.org, please. This is something we definitely > > need to pin down and fix. Thanks Ralph! > > Yes, though I just discovered it on my system, and whilst I

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Dimitris via Dng
On 3/7/19 11:38 AM, Mark Hindley wrote: > You are right that elogind doesn't seem to be updating lastlog. too busy right now, will file this bug report later today if nobody else does. thanks, d signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng
Mark Hindley wrote on 7/3/19 8:38 pm: > Thanks for these reports. I think there are 2 separate things going on here: > > You are right that elogind doesn't seem to be updating lastlog. > > I think this is a different issue from the slim logins not being > registered. This seems to be long

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Mark Hindley
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:07:41AM +0200, Dimitris via Dng wrote: > On 3/7/19 2:00 AM, wirelessduck--- via Dng wrote: > > > > I get nothing listed when running 'w' and 'who'. Checking output of 'last' > > shows the reboot time correctly but my slim login doesn’t appear at all. > > same here. w

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng
Further on this: I've also got a dist-upgraded beowulf with a no-install-recommends installation of task-xfce-desktop, and this one is fine wrt 'w'/'last' report for slim using consolekt, and still fine when I downgraded consolekit to the ascii version. The newest 'slim' is fine btw. A little

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread KatolaZ
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:07:41AM +0200, Dimitris via Dng wrote: > On 3/7/19 2:00 AM, wirelessduck--- via Dng wrote: > > > > I get nothing listed when running 'w' and 'who'. Checking output of 'last' > > shows the reboot time correctly but my slim login doesn’t appear at all. > > same here. w

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Dimitris via Dng
On 3/7/19 2:00 AM, wirelessduck--- via Dng wrote: > > I get nothing listed when running 'w' and 'who'. Checking output of 'last' > shows the reboot time correctly but my slim login doesn’t appear at all. same here. w used to work with lightdm. tty logins still show normally. also tried with

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-06 Thread wirelessduck--- via Dng
> Yes, though I just discovered it on my system, and whilst I believe it's > a plain, dist-upgraded ascii with a well-defined couple of variations, > I've also "fixed things"(tm). > > Does anyone else have bogus 'w'/'last' reports? I’m running consolekit with lightdm on a regular ascii. I just

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-06 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng
KatolaZ wrote on 7/3/19 9:30 am: > Bug report to bugs.devuan.org, please. This is something we definitely > need to pin down and fix. Thanks Ralph! Yes, though I just discovered it on my system, and whilst I believe it's a plain, dist-upgraded ascii with a well-defined couple of variations,

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-06 Thread KatolaZ
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:31:33AM +1100, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: [cut] > > So, apparently 'slim' since long ago believes something else is > responsible for registring the session(s), but that something else > doesn't agree. Maybe that's down to 'consolekit', then? > > A fantastic

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-06 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng
Mark Hindley wrote on 6/3/19 8:10 pm: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 08:00:06PM +1100, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: >> Hmm .. a reboot sorted it(?) I had "0 users" before, but now I'm counted. > > Good! I was too fast: I'm still getting the 'w' report: -- 08:06:53 up 0 min, 0 users, load

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-06 Thread Mark Hindley
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 08:00:06PM +1100, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > Hmm .. a reboot sorted it(?) I had "0 users" before, but now I'm counted. Good! > I pulled in the updated slim (downgrade) into my ASCII laptop, and is > using consolekit (and xfce4), so maybe this is not a useful test at

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-06 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng
Hmm .. a reboot sorted it(?) I had "0 users" before, but now I'm counted. I pulled in the updated slim (downgrade) into my ASCII laptop, and is using consolekit (and xfce4), so maybe this is not a useful test at all. Sorry for the noise. (It seems though the required libfontconfig1 upgrade was an

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-06 Thread Mark Hindley
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 01:38:39PM +1100, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > slim doesn't seem to update /var/run/utmp and /var/log/wtmp anymore? > At least, I found 'sessreg' being commented out in /etc/slim.conf > Or is that me having done sleep-editing (again) maybe. > (My 'w' report is total

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-05 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng
slim doesn't seem to update /var/run/utmp and /var/log/wtmp anymore? At least, I found 'sessreg' being commented out in /etc/slim.conf Or is that me having done sleep-editing (again) maybe. (My 'w' report is total nonsense, although that'd be 'procps' rather than slim I suppose) Ralph Mark

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-05 Thread Clarke Sideroad via Dng
Rebooted to experimental slim, shut down and rebooted again just to see. AMD64 hardware, beowulf/ceres, elogind, lxqt. All seems to be running well for me, so a thumbs up from this seat. Clarke ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-05 Thread Dimitris via Dng
On 3/5/19 2:30 PM, Mark Hindley wrote: > All reports of problems or success gratefully received. just rebooted, slim/experimental + elogind + MATE beowulf/ceres, reporting success :) no issues so far, everything looks normal. (using lightdm before.) thx, d. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-05 Thread KatolaZ
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 12:30:02PM +, Mark Hindley wrote: > Hello, > > We have a new version of slim in experimental (1.3.6-5+devuan6). It has been > changed so that it now works with either elogind or consolekit2. It would be a > great help to have it tested before it moves into

[DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-05 Thread Mark Hindley
Hello, We have a new version of slim in experimental (1.3.6-5+devuan6). It has been changed so that it now works with either elogind or consolekit2. It would be a great help to have it tested before it moves into ceres/beowulf. All reports of problems or success gratefully received. Thanks for