Re: [DNG] SystemD's brownie points over non-systemd OSs.

2016-08-09 Thread Simon Hobson
Edward Bartolo wrote: > Considering the fact that many Linux users moan about not being able > to run the latest "shiny" software, and sometimes even complain and > insist they want their MS Windows applications on their Linux > machines, I have to concede them, that this time

Re: [DNG] SystemD's brownie points over non-systemd OSs.

2016-08-09 Thread Peter Olson
I apologize for top-posting, but I have no idea what you are talking about. For the record, I am not fond of GRUB2 either. Peter Olson > On August 9, 2016 at 1:52 AM Edward Bartolo wrote: > > Considering the fact that many Linux users moan about not being able > to run the

Re: [DNG] SystemD's brownie points over non-systemd OSs.

2016-08-08 Thread Brad Campbell
On 09/08/16 06:03, Go Linux wrote: I posted a link to this response at the FDN link posted above. This was the response from the author of the howto: http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?p=621972#p621972 He concludes: ". . . I would prefer to use the systemd-supplied components

Re: [DNG] SystemD's brownie points over non-systemd OSs.

2016-08-08 Thread Go Linux
On Sun, 8/7/16, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: Subject: Re: [DNG] SystemD's brownie points over non-systemd OSs. To: dng@lists.dyne.org Date: Sunday, August 7, 2016, 9:42 PM On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:31:10PM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote: >> http://forums.debian.net/v

Re: [DNG] SystemD's brownie points over non-systemd OSs.

2016-08-08 Thread Brad Campbell
On 08/08/16 13:44, Aldemir Akpinar wrote: Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:31:10PM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote: On the other hand, full-machine virtualization costs you the max of assigned memory to that system, at all time. Going off-topic but I just wanted to correct this statement,

Re: [DNG] SystemD's brownie points over non-systemd OSs.

2016-08-07 Thread Aldemir Akpinar
> Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:31:10PM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote: > > On the other hand, full-machine virtualization costs you the max of > assigned > memory to that system, at all time. > Going off-topic but I just wanted to correct this statement, when you're using full machine virtualization in

Re: [DNG] SystemD's brownie points over non-systemd OSs.

2016-08-07 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 06:31:10PM +0200, Edward Bartolo wrote: > http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=16=621842#p621842 > > Excuse me for the topic title. But the above link at first looked like > some inherent advantage in using SystemD. However, after a little > reflection, a couple of

Re: [DNG] SystemD's brownie points over non-systemd OSs.

2016-08-07 Thread Brad Campbell
On 08/08/16 00:31, Edward Bartolo wrote: Hi All, http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=16=621842#p621842 Excuse me for the topic title. But the above link at first looked like some inherent advantage in using SystemD. However, after a little reflection, a couple of minutes, it seems there

[DNG] SystemD's brownie points over non-systemd OSs.

2016-08-07 Thread Edward Bartolo
Hi All, http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=16=621842#p621842 Excuse me for the topic title. But the above link at first looked like some inherent advantage in using SystemD. However, after a little reflection, a couple of minutes, it seems there are actually no extra brownie-points in