On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 23:25:24 +0200
KatolaZ wrote:
> Killing Devuan would require either five buses hitting five people at
> the same time in five different countries across the globe, or three
> fires hitting three different data centers at exactly the same time.
Either way, I'd suspect Redhat.
Il giorno venerdì 05/04/2019 11:22:48 -0700
Rick Moen ha scritto:
> Quoting Andrew McGlashan (andrew.mcglas...@affinityvision.com.au):
>
> > What if Katolaz gets hit by a bus?
>
> Ah! A proper scientific question. There is precedent for this:
>
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 15:02:51 -0700, Rick wrote in message
<20190405220251.gx15...@linuxmafia.com>:
> Quoting KatolaZ (kato...@freaknet.org):
>
> > Killing Devuan would require either five buses hitting five people
> > at the same time in five different countries across the globe, or
> > three
Quoting KatolaZ (kato...@freaknet.org):
> Killing Devuan would require either five buses hitting five people at
> the same time in five different countries across the globe, or three
> fires hitting three different data centers at exactly the same time.
Those buses _are_ clever predators,
On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 04:37:31AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> On 6/4/19 12:41 am, chillfan--- via Dng wrote:
> > I'm not sure then if the bus-factor does apply, but I'm sure none
> > of the core developers are the type to cross
Quoting Andrew McGlashan (andrew.mcglas...@affinityvision.com.au):
> What if Katolaz gets hit by a bus?
Ah! A proper scientific question. There is precedent for this:
http://web.archive.org/web/2003013913/http://segfault.org/story.phtml?mode=2=38b40d78-087dd360
--
Cheers,There's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 6/4/19 12:41 am, chillfan--- via Dng wrote:
> I'm not sure then if the bus-factor does apply, but I'm sure none
> of the core developers are the type to cross the road without
> looking ;-)
Sure, but the "bus factor" is not just relating to
On Fri, 05 Apr 2019 13:41:34 +, chillfan--- wrote in message
:
> On Friday, April 5, 2019 2:19 PM, Andrew McGlashan
> wrote:
...
> > There is a different, but also VERY IMPORTANT consideration here.
> >
>
> > What if Katolaz gets hit by a bus?
> >
>
> > Whilst I do appreciate the
It was just more relevant for this discussion to mention Katolaz and his hard
work. There are other core developers who are also working hard.
I'm not sure then if the bus-factor does apply, but I'm sure none of the core
developers are the type to cross the road without looking ;-)
Cheers,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 14:28:20 +0200, info wrote in message
:
> But i am working in ICT and in construction and the two areas where
> you do not joke about are security and safety.
..I _slightly_ disagree: People who screw up on these 2 like the Bush
regime, the Obama regime and the Trump regime
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 5/4/19 11:28 pm, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
> On 05-04-19 11:16, Simon Hobson wrote:
>> chillfan wrote:
>>
>>> Katolaz is working very hard to ensure we have releases, but I
>>> didn't realise he was doing all this even.
>> I
On 05-04-19 11:16, Simon Hobson wrote:
> chillfan wrote:
>
>> Katolaz is working very hard to ensure we have releases, but I didn't
>> realise he was doing all this even.
> I didn't either.
> So another +1 for Katolaz and all the work he's doing. And everyone else of
> course, but I think it's a
chillfan wrote:
> Katolaz is working very hard to ensure we have releases, but I didn't realise
> he was doing all this even.
I didn't either.
So another +1 for Katolaz and all the work he's doing. And everyone else of
course, but I think it's a bit unfair for people to be calling for heads on
Katolaz is working very hard to ensure we have releases, but I didn't realise
he was doing all this even. There shouldn't be any sore feelings over this or
anything personal.
He really had me there for a moment but gopher and browser complaints were good
clues something isn't quite right ;)
Jaromil writes:
he is now in moderation. if the trolling comes back from other
accounts please don't feed.
Thank you, I was coming to suggest that as well.
The whole going-for-blood-or-else thing was getting on my nerves.
People particularly concerned with security did the sensible thing
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:46:28 -0700, Mike wrote in message
<201904020946.28450.mgb-dev...@yosemite.net>:
> On Tue April 2 2019 07:30:58 Jaromil wrote:
> > 1. There was no break-in on any part of Devuan's infrastructure on
> > 1st April. This was the most skillfull prank I've witnessed in my
> >
Jaromil - 02.04.19, 20:10:
> he is now in moderation. if the trolling comes back from other
> accounts please don't feed.
And I already thought I just overreacted.
I suggest to just let the whole topic rest for a while.
If there is anything remaining, I bet its much more easy to clear up
with
Mike Bird - 02.04.19, 18:46:
> On Tue April 2 2019 07:30:58 Jaromil wrote:
> > 1. There was no break-in on any part of Devuan's infrastructure on
> > 1st>
> >April. This was the most skillfull prank I've witnessed in my
> >life.
>
> You are easily impressed. And you double down on
Dear Jaromil.
Jaromil - 02.04.19, 16:30:
> dear readers,
>
> as a Devuan caretaker and co-founder, in my own personal capacity, let
> me state that:
>
> 1. There was no break-in on any part of Devuan's infrastructure on 1st
> April. This was the most skillfull prank I've witnessed in my life.
dear Antony
On Tue, 02 Apr 2019, Antony Stone wrote:
>
> I also fail to see how a lawyer can possibly decide whether it's "safe to
> keep
> a production system on Devuan".
my thanks to you and many others here for having taken the time to
gracefully comment on the issue and show your
On Tue April 2 2019 10:31:11 Antony Stone wrote:
> Well, as Jaromil eloquently pointed out, since you have no contract with
> Devuan, and it is clearly distributed WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY (I only
> capitalise because that's the way it's written in all the notices letting
> you know), I don't think
On Tuesday 02 April 2019 at 18:46:28, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Tue April 2 2019 07:30:58 Jaromil wrote:
> > There was no break-in on any part of Devuan's infrastructure on 1st
> > April. This was the most skillfull prank I've witnessed in my life.
>
> You are easily impressed. And you double down
On Tue April 2 2019 07:30:58 Jaromil wrote:
> 1. There was no break-in on any part of Devuan's infrastructure on 1st
>April. This was the most skillfull prank I've witnessed in my life.
You are easily impressed. And you double down on KatolaZ's
irresponsible vandalism with a display of lazy
dear readers,
as a Devuan caretaker and co-founder, in my own personal capacity, let
me state that:
1. There was no break-in on any part of Devuan's infrastructure on 1st
April. This was the most skillfull prank I've witnessed in my life.
2. Devuan comes WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY. Bluntly put, if
24 matches
Mail list logo