Re: [DNG] busybox init

Le 04/01/2022 à 03:08, Steve Litt a écrit : k...@aspodata.se said on Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:45:28 +0100 (CET) Would there be any interests having a busybox_init package which I could possible maintain (with a little help) ? My opinion is that the more init systems the merrier, except for

Re: [DNG] busybox init

Steve Litt: ... > If busybox init does not require daemons to self-background, I'd be > even more enthusiastic. ... Busybox init has its inittab, mostly for gettys, and a boot script, that is your options. Having daemons not-backgrounded in the rcS script isn't practical and I don't think that

Re: [DNG] busybox init

Karl: > I have used busybox init for a while. It differs from sysvinit > by not having runlevels, except perhaps on and off. ... > One could possible (not tested) mimic sysvinit bootup by having > for i in /etc/rc2.d/S*; do $i start; done > in the rcS file or if you prefer you can have your own

Re: [DNG] busybox init

Curtis Maurand: ... > I was reading the “comment on systemd” article. the last two sview > and svcpage could be aliases to those shell scripts rewritten to > take cli arguments in your .bashrc. Whats wrong with grep named /var/log/messages | less and similar ? /// Don't cc me, I'm on the

Re: [DNG] busybox init

> On Jan 3, 2022, at 6:08 PM, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > > Didier Kryn: >>> Le 03/01/2022 à 21:27, tito via Dng a écrit : >>> On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:45:28 +0100 (CET) >>> k...@aspodata.se wrote: > ... The sysinit thing is a how you start the system, it's just one script

Re: [DNG] busybox init

k...@aspodata.se said on Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:45:28 +0100 (CET) >Would there be any interests having a busybox_init package which >I could possible maintain (with a little help) ? My opinion is that the more init systems the merrier, except for systemd. If busybox init does not require daemons

Re: [DNG] busybox init

Didier Kryn: > Le 03/01/2022 à 21:27, tito via Dng a écrit : > > On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:45:28 +0100 (CET) > > k...@aspodata.se wrote: ... > >> The sysinit thing is a how you start the system, it's just > >> one script /etc/init.d/rcS (or where you prefer to place it). > >> > >> One could

Re: [DNG] busybox init

Le 03/01/2022 à 21:27, tito via Dng a écrit : On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:45:28 +0100 (CET) k...@aspodata.se wrote: I have used busybox init for a while. It differs from sysvinit by not having runlevels, except perhaps on and off. Busybox repo is at: git://busybox.net/busybox.git Website at:

Re: [DNG] busybox init

On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 18:45:28 +0100 (CET) k...@aspodata.se wrote: > I have used busybox init for a while. It differs from sysvinit > by not having runlevels, except perhaps on and off. > > Busybox repo is at: git://busybox.net/busybox.git > Website at: https://busybox.net/ > Comment re. systemd:

[DNG] busybox init

I have used busybox init for a while. It differs from sysvinit by not having runlevels, except perhaps on and off. Busybox repo is at: git://busybox.net/busybox.git Website at: https://busybox.net/ Comment re. systemd: https://busybox.net/kill_it_with_fire.txt Example inittab at:

Re: [DNG] Busybox Init: Was tiny service state api [WAS: Fwd: init system agnosticism]

Steve Litt: ... > This is the perfect opportunity to explore this more. Karl is one of > the tiny minority of people to have successfully booted using the > Busybox Init. Why do you make it sound like it is difficult, it isn't something that you need any advanced skill to solve. It's just that

[DNG] Busybox Init: Was tiny service state api [WAS: Fwd: init system agnosticism]

On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:29:12 +0100 Simon Hobson wrote: > k...@aspodata.se wrote: > But then I'm one of those generally happy with SysVInit style > booting. It's easy to understand, it's generally reliable, it's > fairly easy to debug if something isn't right. But I also

Re: [DNG] busybox

"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" writes: > On 01.11.2015 14:52, Rainer Weikusat wrote: >> It's also strangely schizophrenic as there's no point in zero-filling >> the entire structure prior to initializing its members one by one >> which implies zero-filling the larger

Re: [DNG] busybox

On 01.11.2015 14:52, Rainer Weikusat wrote: > It's also strangely schizophrenic as there's no point in zero-filling > the entire structure prior to initializing its members one by one > which implies zero-filling the larger part of the second one[*] > again. That's called "defensive programming"

Re: [DNG] busybox

posts like this are the reason I decided to switch to an existing distribution that doesn't use systemd rather than wait for Devuan. --seth > On 31 Oct 2015, at 20:14, Teodoro Santoni wrote: > > 2015-10-31 17:30 GMT+01:00, Adam Borowski : >> How do

Re: [DNG] busybox

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 09:29:31AM +0100, sth wrote: > posts like this are the reason I decided to switch to an existing > distribution that doesn't use systemd rather than wait for Devuan. Seriously? There are much worse posts on here, but you chose “top lel” as an example? signature.asc

Re: [DNG] busybox

yes, you are right. there are plenty more posts that I could have used for an example. no disrespect to the folks working hard on Devuan related projects. you are doing great work. --seth > On 01 Nov 2015, at 10:27, Jack L. Frost wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at

Re: [DNG] busybox

Adam Borowski writes: > How do you guys like this:? > http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=accd9eeb719916da974584b33b1aeced5f3bb346 I think that's a silly reason for removing a feature. But I found something nicer while doing a (minimal) bit of research on sd_listen:

Re: [DNG] busybox

Le 31/10/2015 17:54, Isaac Dunham a écrit : On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 05:30:15PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: >How do you guys like this:? >http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=accd9eeb719916da974584b33b1aeced5f3bb346 :), though I hadn't heard about it despite being on the Busybox list. A

Re: [DNG] busybox

On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 17:30 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > How do you guys like this:? > http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=accd9eeb719916da974584b33b1aeced5f3bb346 Quoting from the commit: "systemd people are not willing to play nice with the rest of the world. Therefore there is no reason

Re: [DNG] busybox

On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 05:30:15PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > How do you guys like this:? > http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=accd9eeb719916da974584b33b1aeced5f3bb346 :), though I hadn't heard about it despite being on the Busybox list. A lot of the people over there are *at least* as

Re: [DNG] busybox

Any more details on why exactly they removed this code?  I'd like to know more, and that commit message isn't exactly clear. -Jonathan On Saturday, October 31, 2015 2:10 PM, Svante Signell wrote: On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 17:30 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: >

Re: [DNG] busybox

2015-10-31 17:30 GMT+01:00, Adam Borowski : > How do you guys like this:? > http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=accd9eeb719916da974584b33b1aeced5f3bb346 Top lel ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org

Re: [DNG] busybox

On Sat, 31 Oct 2015 19:10:29 +0100 Svante Signell wrote: > On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 17:30 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > How do you guys like this:? > > http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=accd9eeb719916da974584b33b1aeced5f3bb346 > > Quoting from the commit: >

[DNG] busybox

How do you guys like this:? http://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=accd9eeb719916da974584b33b1aeced5f3bb346 -- ⢎⣉⠂⠠⠤⡀⣄⠤⡀⠠⡅⠀⠤⡧⠄⡄⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠠⡅⠀⡠⠤⠄⠀⠀⠀⢴⠍⠀⡠⠤⡀⣄⠤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠤⡧⠄⣇⠤⡀⡠⠤⡀⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⡄⡠⠤⡀⠠⠤⡀⡇⡠⠄⠀⠀⠀ ⠢⠤⠃⠪⠭⠇⠇⠀⠇⠀⠣⠀⠀⠣⠄⠨⠭⠃⠣⠀⠬⠭⠂⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠣⠤⠃⠇⠀⠀⠣⠄⠇⠀⠇⠫⠭⠁⠀⠀⠀⠣⠣⠃⠫⠭⠁⠪⠭⠇⠏⠢⠄⠀⠄⠀ (https://github.com/kilobyte/braillefont