On Fri, 05 Apr 2019 15:21:06 +
chillfan--- via Dng wrote:
> Indeed there is Icecat that is DRM free.
>
> Iceweasel-UXP just covers some more of the criteria of what people
> would consider less frustrating or is closer to a real fork since
> they change things at the code level.
>
> It
Indeed there is Icecat that is DRM free.
Iceweasel-UXP just covers some more of the criteria of what people would
consider less frustrating or is closer to a real fork since they change things
at the code level.
It would be interesting if there was a version of Icecat based on Iceweasel-UXP.
Il giorno venerdì 05/04/2019 13:50:03 +
chill...@protonmail.com ha scritto:
> Might potentially be a solution if anyone did decide to package another
> browser to try to solve the problem, since it comes from the hyperbola
> project.
Another is the GNU/IceCat browser:
- IceCat project
Might potentially be a solution if anyone did decide to package another browser
to try to solve the problem, since it comes from the hyperbola project.
They follow a "when it's ready" release cycle afaik which probably means they
have patches of their that can be applied, making things a
The problems as I see them are:
Browsers either have DRM or they are bloated with features some don't expect to
be there and are no modularity at all. Sometimes you can disable a feature but
not remove it.
The alternatives are often not packaged by Debian, so if they don't have it
then we'd
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 08:06:14AM +, chillfan--- via Dng wrote:
>
> There are many of us frustrated with web browsers and the web in general,
Is there anything that can be done about this?
Browsers seem to be an all-or-nothing kind of nonmodularity.
Yet they should have components that
