Re: [DNG] on the supposed grsec gpl violation

On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 4:31 AM, Jaromil wrote: > I first thought grsec was not in GPL violation, but then in your last > 3 mails and this one you made the point very clear and I'm more than > half-way convinced (yet my opinion is of little value here, IANAL nor > a scholar in

[DNG] on the supposed grsec gpl violation

dear Bruce, On Sun, 02 Jul 2017, Bruce Perens wrote: >This might make a little more sense if you still can't >understand: By operating under their previously-stated policy of >denying further service to clients who exercise their right to >distribute under the GPL license, Open