Hi,
Hendrik Boom writes:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 06:05:39PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
>> Hendrik Boom writes:
>>
>> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 12:39:11PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
>> >> Is there a reason not to use `rsync -n` ?
>> >
>> > Ahhh... That's what -n is for. I missed it looking
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 08:39:29 -0400
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > And if you want to see the differences, you may be interested in
> > rdiff. Haven't used it myself but sound (and looks) like it fits
> > your bill.
>
> That's just what I thought... but the man page I have for rdiff says
> nothing
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 06:05:39PM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Hendrik Boom writes:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 12:39:11PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> >> Is there a reason not to use `rsync -n` ?
> >
> > Ahhh... That's what -n is for. I missed it looking through the man page.
>
> And if you
Hendrik Boom writes:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 12:39:11PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
>> Is there a reason not to use `rsync -n` ?
>
> Ahhh... That's what -n is for. I missed it looking through the man page.
And if you want to see the differences, you may be interested in rdiff.
Haven't used it
I do a lot of rsync stuff on some rpm based systems (Opensuse and Scientific Linux, I have NO idea if that has any actual bearing ) but I find I have to "force" flush the caches
after BIG rsync operations (multi terabytes syncs) because memory use skyrockets and "sticks" at the top.
On
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 09:20:13AM +1000, Ralph Ronnquist wrote:
> You might also consider using sshfs, then "diff -r", if you want to detail
> the differences.
That takes too much network bandwidth. Otherwise just fine.
-- hendrik
___
Dng mailing
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 12:39:11PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Is there a reason not to use `rsync -n` ?
Ahhh... That's what -n is for. I missed it looking through the man page.
-- hendrik
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
You might also consider using sshfs, then "diff -r", if you want to
detail the differences.
Ralph.
Joel Roth wrote on 26/08/18 08:39:
Is there a reason not to use `rsync -n` ?
Hendrik Boom wrote:
Is there something like rsync that compares a local and a remote file
tree and reports
Is there a reason not to use `rsync -n` ?
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Is there something like rsync that compares a local and a remote file
> tree and reports differences without coying or transmitting all the files?
>
> I remember once being told that md5sum had an option to recurse through
> a
Is there something like rsync that compares a local and a remote file
tree and reports differences without coying or transmitting all the files?
I remember once being told that md5sum had an option to recurse through
a directory tree, summing every file. But I can't find such an option
in
10 matches
Mail list logo
