Le 24/12/2020 à 19:55, Simon Hobson a écrit :
> Didier Kryn wrote:
>
>> Therefore I suspect the authors managed to launch several threads in order
>> to save 0.01s of the boot time. Or to loose more because thread scheduling
>> might well consume more than what parallelism saves.
> In the
On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 18:55:46 +
Simon Hobson wrote:
> Didier Kryn wrote:
>
> > Therefore I suspect the authors managed to launch several threads
> > in order to save 0.01s of the boot time. Or to loose more because
> > thread scheduling might well consume more than what parallelism
> >
Didier Kryn wrote:
> Therefore I suspect the authors managed to launch several threads in order to
> save 0.01s of the boot time. Or to loose more because thread scheduling might
> well consume more than what parallelism saves.
In the general case, parallelism only saves wall clock time IFF
