On 07/01/17 21:21, Simon Hobson wrote:
In general - none !
So, why not just patching the crap out and filing an upstream bug
(incl. notifying the folks here, so we can keep an eye on it) ?
--mtx
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 18:36:40 -0500
Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > > fate accompli
> > "Fate"
> > is very apposite in the circumstance
> One misspell and a person's reputation is shot forever!
> :-)
And me thinking it was purposefully done ;-3)
Cheers,
Ron.
--
* On 2017 01 Jul 11:47 -0500, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 10:25:20 -0500
> Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> > fate accompli
>
> "Fate"
> is very apposite in the circumstance
One misspell and a person's reputation is shot forever!
:-)
- Nate
--
"The optimist proclaims
Le 01/07/2017 à 18:46, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI a écrit :
On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 10:25:20 -0500
Nate Bargmann wrote:
fate accompli
"Fate"
is very apposite in the circumstance
Cheers,
Ron.
"Fait accompli" means "accomplished fact", something it's a
nonsense to oppose to,
"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" wrote:
> At that point I'm curious which fancy features of systemd are needed
> by applications at all ?
In general - none !
But, it seems that the technique being used by it's proponents is to substitute
their stuff and "force" new
Quoting Nate Bargmann (n...@n0nb.us):
> I'll admit, there was one trick that SD did that I liked, and that was
> starting CUPS only when there was a call to print. I don't print often
> so bringing up CUPS on demand and then shutting it down later was nice.
> But then, SD was running all the
On Sat, 1 Jul 2017 10:25:20 -0500
Nate Bargmann wrote:
> fate accompli
"Fate"
is very apposite in the circumstance
Cheers,
Ron.
--
It is a typically Hohenzollern idea to believe that it is a crime
for a country to defend itself after its army has been destroyed.
* On 2017 01 Jul 08:49 -0500, vmlinux wrote:
> It makes more sense when you consider that systemd is a thinly veiled
> excuse for an init daemon which really wants to replace every distro
> out there with something red hat has more control over.
Certainly, that trend has been well established.
It makes more sense when you consider that systemd is a thinly veiled excuse
for an init daemon which really wants to replace every distro out there with
something red hat has more control over.
On July 1, 2017 8:25:56 AM CDT, vmlinux wrote:
::
::
::On June 30, 2017
On June 30, 2017 1:14:24 AM CDT, Nate Bargmann wrote:
::* On 2017 30 Jun 00:55 -0500, Alessandro Selli wrote:
::
::> Maybe it's me, but what the hell is a DNS resolver doing inside an
::init
::> system?
::
::The same thing that a time sync (NTP) daemon is doing in there...
::
On 30/06/17 08:56, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> It's driven by Red Hat to make money out of supporting their
> development.
>
Hammer -> Nail
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 09:07:46 +0200
Jaromil wrote:
> If you wait by the river long enough, the bodies of your enemies will float
> by.
> - Sun Tzu
I'm afraid he never wrote that: See for instance
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Aldemir Akpinar wrote:
> On 30 June 2017 at 09:14, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > * On 2017 30 Jun 00:55 -0500, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe it's me, but what the hell is a DNS resolver doing inside an init
> >> system?
> >
> > The same thing that a time
Am Freitag, 30. Juni 2017 schrieb Aldemir Akpinar:
> On 30 June 2017 at 09:14, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> > * On 2017 30 Jun 00:55 -0500, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe it's me, but what the hell is a DNS resolver doing inside an init
> >> system?
> >
> > The same thing that a
Am 2017-06-30 07:53, schrieb Alessandro Selli:
Maybe it's me, but what the hell is a DNS resolver doing inside an
init
system?
systemd is _NOT_ an init system. That's a mythos. Systemd started as an
init system, but evolved step-by-step to a monolithic low level Linux
userland. It's
On 30 June 2017 at 09:14, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2017 30 Jun 00:55 -0500, Alessandro Selli wrote:
>
>> Maybe it's me, but what the hell is a DNS resolver doing inside an init
>> system?
>
> The same thing that a time sync (NTP) daemon is doing in there...
>
> - Nate
>
And
* On 2017 30 Jun 00:55 -0500, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> Maybe it's me, but what the hell is a DNS resolver doing inside an init
> system?
The same thing that a time sync (NTP) daemon is doing in there...
- Nate
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.
Issues just keep piling up:
https://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-3341-1/
Summary
systemd-resolved could be made to crash or run programs if it received a
specially crafted DNS response.
Details
An out-of-bounds write was discovered in systemd-resolved when handling
specially crafted DNS responses.
18 matches
Mail list logo