Since I have time on my hands, I would like to give a try stripping
the bare minimum of necessary functions from systemd. I know the task
is complex. If I fail, it will not be the end of the universe.
Which systemd source version are you using? I am assuming it should be
version: 215-17 from
Since I have time on my hands, I would like to give a try stripping
the bare minimum of necessary functions from systemd. I know the task
is complex. If I fail, it will not be the end of the universe.
Which systemd source version are you using? I am assuming it should be
version: 215-17 from
11:27:10 +0100
From: l...@diamand.org
To: jud...@gmail.com
CC: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Dng] Which source version fo systemd are you stripping code
from?
You might want to take a look at uselessd, which I think is an attempt
to do something similar.
http
...@realitysend.com
Sent: 5/7/2015 7:46 PM
To: dng@lists.dyne.orgmailto:dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Dng] Which source version fo systemd are you stripping code from?
On 05/07/2015 09:59 PM, James Powell wrote:
Etcnet was very involved with scripts which was always a problem for
Red Hat. Many
On 05/07/2015 09:59 PM, James Powell wrote:
Etcnet was very involved with scripts which was always a problem for
Red Hat. Many Red Hat scripts have been known for being substandard in
quality and reliability, possibly a reason why they wanted systemd so bad.
However, any daemon can work well
Dunhammailto:ibid...@gmail.com
Sent: 5/7/2015 8:05 PM
To: Alex 'AdUser' Zmailto:ad_u...@runbox.com
Cc: dng@lists.dyne.orgmailto:dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Dng] Which source version fo systemd are you stripping code from?
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 11:40:28AM +1000, Alex 'AdUser' Z wrote:
Netplug
are corrected properly.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Alex 'AdUser' Zmailto:ad_u...@runbox.com
Sent: 5/7/2015 6:40 PM
To: dng@lists.dyne.orgmailto:dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Dng] Which source version fo systemd are you stripping code from?
Netplug
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 11:40:28AM +1000, Alex 'AdUser' Z wrote:
Netplug, NetworkManager, inetd, xinetd, dhcpcd, and dhcp(client) to name a
few already did the same work.
Netplug is possibly the lightest weight of them all and provides
connectivity device management as well as net
