[DNG] dovecot / exim4 / system users -- restriction of emails per user

2017-05-12 Thread Andrew McGlashan
Hi, I'm sure that this has been solved, but I can't find the answers and I'm having trouble crafting a solution. Running exim4 4.8+ (with split setup) / dovecot 1:2.1+ -- with system user auth and virtual users with exim4. Each system user login can use ANY email address for "sender and/or repl

Re: [DNG] dovecot / exim4 / system users -- restriction of emails per user

2017-05-12 Thread Arnt Gulbrandsen
IIRC this isn't at all simple with that software. For mostly poor reasons that may have changed since last time I looked. You could approximate it with a bit of hacking, though: Use exim to force a bcc to something like policyviolation@asdf, and use a generated sieve file for that address to c

Re: [DNG] dovecot / exim4 / system users -- restriction of emails per user

2017-05-12 Thread Andrew McGlashan
Hi, On 12/05/17 21:34, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > IIRC this isn't at all simple with that software. For mostly poor > reasons that may have changed since last time I looked. > > You could approximate it with a bit of hacking, though: Use exim to > force a bcc to something like policyviolation@asdf

[DNG] unoffic-grsec 4.9.27 kernel compile, one last hurdle

2017-05-12 Thread Miroslav Rovis
Hi! I'm trying to compile grsec, unofficial, by minipli[1]: https://github.com/minipli/linux-unofficial_grsec/tree/linux-4.9.x-unofficial_grsec I think I got (maybe only) one serious hurdle (left to go) to install grsec-hardened kernel in my Devuan machine[2]. I used the script that a lot of use

Re: [DNG] unoffic-grsec 4.9.27 kernel compile, one last hurdle

2017-05-12 Thread Jaromil
dear Miroslav, On Fri, 12 May 2017, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > [4] Will git.devuan.org be getting more reliable in availability, is > that expected? I wouldn't mind that it couldn't possibly be as > perfect and fast as gihub, for that the Team would need to > collude with the mighty, whi

Re: [DNG] unoffic-grsec 4.9.27 kernel compile, one last hurdle

2017-05-12 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 170512-22:32+0200, Jaromil wrote: > dear Miroslav, > > On Fri, 12 May 2017, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > > [4] Will git.devuan.org be getting more reliable in availability, is > > that expected? I wouldn't mind that it couldn't possibly be as > > perfect and fast as gihub, for that the Te

Re: [DNG] unoffic-grsec 4.9.27 kernel compile, one last hurdle

2017-05-12 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 170512-22:49+0200, Mathias Krause wrote: > Hi Miroslav, > > On 12 May 2017 at 22:06, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > [...] > > dpkg-gencontrol: error: illegal package name > > 'linux-headers-4.9.27-unofficial_grsec170512-14': character '_' not allowed > > scripts/package/Makefile:91: recipe for tar

Re: [DNG] unoffic-grsec 4.9.27 kernel compile, one last hurdle

2017-05-12 Thread Miroslav Rovis
On 170513-00:21+0200, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > On 170512-22:49+0200, Mathias Krause wrote: > > Hi Miroslav, > > > > On 12 May 2017 at 22:06, Miroslav Rovis > > wrote: > > > [...] ... > > Thanks for testing! > Very glad that I'm getting useful... Been working hard for years... > > > > Regards, >

[DNG] reportbug default bts

2017-05-12 Thread Joel Roth
Hi, I'm running Devuan/Jessie, having migrated from Debian/Jessie. Being advised to file bugs at bugs.devuan.org, I viewed the site, which recommends using reportbug as the preferred way to report bugs. When I ran reportbug and filed a bug, I was surprised to see the report went to Debian.

Re: [DNG] reportbug default bts

2017-05-12 Thread KatolaZ
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:41:23PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote: [cut] > > When I ran reportbug and filed a bug, I was surprised to > see the report went to Debian. > > /etc/reportbug.conf (which I've never edited) > has no bts setting. > > $ reportbug --bts help > > Valid bug tracking systems: >