On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 10:36:50 -0300
Emiliano Marini wrote:
> Not new, but now based on Devuan.
>
> EterTICs GNU/Linux is a GNU/Linux distribution aimed for community
> radios of Latinamerica. His goal is to be 100% libre and it has all
> the software needed to setup a
1. SPF is a friendlier solution and enough for this.
3. GPG signatures is more standard and friendlier solution for this.
This kind of tricky solutions (as DKIM) only make people to move to
other easier but non-neutral technologies, hosted services such as
WhatsApp or web-based.
El 03/08/17 a
Quoting Simon Hobson (li...@thehobsons.co.uk):
> SPF breaks mailing lists and mail forwarders - and this is NOT (IMO)
> fixable without introducing a wide open front gate for spammers to
> ride through and completely bypass SPF.
No. it does not break mailing lists. It _does_ break other common
For what it's worth, SPF, DKIM and DMARC were developed by largely
different sets of people, who disagreed without each other about what
was acceptable tradeoffs, what was doable and more.
The "they" you
mention act senselessly because it is not one set of people. Patching
up email against
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
This is just a test mail, please ignore. This time without MIME/PGP
signing, because it causes mailman to add a multipart header before
the message, which interferes with the DKIM check.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
This is just a test mail, please ignore. I have changed my OpenDKIM
config again, and added Return-Path, References and In-Reply-To to the
list of headers to be not covered by DKIM. (also, I switched back to
MIME/PGP signing, I think I'll just have to search a better mail client
for that.)
On Thu, 2017-08-03 at 03:31 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2017 10:36:50 -0300
> >
> > EterTICs GNU/Linux is a GNU/Linux distribution aimed for community
> > radios of Latinamerica. His goal is to be 100% libre and it has all
> > the software needed to setup a "libre" radio including
Quoting Daniel Abrecht (d...@danielabrecht.ch):
> This is just a test mail, please ignore. This time without MIME/PGP
> signing, because it causes mailman to add a multipart header before
> the message, which interferes with the DKIM check.
Not a complaint, just an observation. On every system
Daniel, again, thank you for your efforts to collect diagnostic data for
the Devuan Project, and for your care and precision.
I respect the reasons you're making DMARC work for your domain, and
certainly have no argument with you doing so (though I do not come to
the same conclusion for my own
Hi all,
If any of you is proficient in Vim's internal language (I think it's
called VimL), and you want to work on a Free Software project, I need
your help.
I'm forking VimOutliner (VO), because the project's current crew changed
VO's main keyboard prefix from easy ,, to wrist-twisting and
Narcis Garcia wrote:
> 1. SPF is a friendlier solution and enough for this.
SPF breaks mailing lists and mail forwarders - and this is NOT (IMO) fixable
without introducing a wide open front gate for spammers to ride through and
completely bypass SPF.
So consider that
11 matches
Mail list logo