Rick,
would you please cease using negatively charged buzzwords,
like "conspiracy theories"
while your counterpart is talking about existing legitimate (good or bad but
legitimate)
business interests and motivations which are _not_ hidden at all.
Also, in my humble opinion, the following is a
On Thu, 21 May 2020 05:13:52 +0100
tux...@sapo.pt wrote:
> Citando Steve Litt :
>
> > This whole discussion balances on the definition of "shell aware".
> > What is "shell aware?"
> >
> > SteveT
> >
> >
>
> Have you tried to write shell script code into the execution command
> of a
>> On 21 May 2020, at 17:31, Steve Litt wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 21 May 2020 05:13:52 +0100
>> tux...@sapo.pt wrote:
>>
>> Citando Steve Litt :
>>> This whole discussion balances on the definition of "shell aware".
>>> What is "shell aware?"
>>> SteveT
>> Have you tried to write shell script
Le 21/05/2020 à 11:39, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp a écrit :
When you take a look at "government media" in EU and Austria in particular you will find
that there's a bashing of people not conforming with mainstream media. Narrative goes "you do
not love your goverment, you think there's a hidden agenda,
Le 21/05/2020 à 02:05, Steve Litt a écrit :
Rick Moen via Dng wrote:
conspiracy hypothesis.
Conspiracies happen. Not every event is brought forth by a single
person. I remember a time when scads of us Linux enthusiasts conspired
to depose Microsoft. "Conspiracy theory" is not an insult,
If LP doesn't see the obvious benefit of making systemd optional, I
can't see that he'd go to the trouble of creating a plug-and-play setup
to allow alternatives to systemd to get in on the act. (Would a dictator
suggest the tryout of other political systems, to see how they stacked
up against
Anno domini 2020 Thu, 21 May 11:30:31 +0200
Didier Kryn scripsit:
> Le 21/05/2020 à 02:05, Steve Litt a écrit :
> > Rick Moen via Dng wrote:
> >
> >> conspiracy hypothesis.
> > Conspiracies happen. Not every event is brought forth by a single
> > person. I remember a time when scads of us Linux
Quoting g4sra via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> Um, is this what you were referring to ?
> https://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/ibm-closes-landmark-acquisition-red-hat-34-billion-defines-open-hybrid-cloud-future
Oh, _do_ go on, sir.
Sadly, I'm guessing you actually have no plan to flesh
On 2020-05-20 18:45, Steve Litt wrote:
> It really is just that simple. There's no need to add anything to
> accommodate badly behaved init system authors.
I wanted to add:
5. reaping orphan processes when they die
but I had the good sense to read the wikipedia article "Orphan process"
first,
On 21/05/2020 21:24, Rick Moen via Dng wrote:
> Quoting Didier Kryn (k...@in2p3.fr):
>
>> When a company takes action to increase its share of the market and/or
>> its cash flow, we normally do not call that a conspiration. It is
>> legitimate to write about it and discuss the actions it takes.
>
Quoting Didier Kryn (k...@in2p3.fr):
> When a company takes action to increase its share of the market and/or
> its cash flow, we normally do not call that a conspiration. It is
> legitimate to write about it and discuss the actions it takes.
And, in the matter at hand, RHAT's underwriting of
On Thu, 21 May 2020 10:59:15 +0100
Peter Duffy wrote:
> I think that the thing that I found tantalising was the idea of
> sniffing what systemd tried to do, and then deciding whether or not
> to do it,
Many have tried this. Web search "uselessd".
But your suggestion becomes much more
Quoting dal (d...@chalmers.se):
> would you please cease using negatively charged buzzwords, like
> "conspiracy theories"
It's not necessarily derogation to use that and similar phrases: It's
description. To quote Richard Hostadter's ground-breaking 1964 article:
Nothing really prevents a
Anno domini 2020 Thu, 21 May 13:09:32 +0100
ael scripsit:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 05:04:57AM +0100, tux...@sapo.pt wrote:
> > I forgot..
> > The bootloader needs support for f2fs, but since you are able to launch the
> > kernel, it should be supported by definition( it loads the kernel into
> >
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 07:03:45PM +0200, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> Anno domini 2020 Thu, 21 May 13:09:32 +0100
> ael scripsit:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 05:04:57AM +0100, tux...@sapo.pt wrote:
> > > I forgot..
> > > The bootloader needs support for f2fs, but since you are able to launch
> >
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 05:04:57AM +0100, tux...@sapo.pt wrote:
> I forgot..
> The bootloader needs support for f2fs, but since you are able to launch the
> kernel, it should be supported by definition( it loads the kernel into
> memory...so it access the block device.. )..
But you need the f2fs
16 matches
Mail list logo