I'd definitively preferred:
Devuan embraces Systemd!
After thorough discussions in our technical committee Devuan decided to
ship systemd with its next release "Beowulf" as the standard init.
Systemd is a complete pot of terware that will enhance Devuan to an
industry approved, enterprise grade
Hi all
Steve's initiative can in deed have some good effect and it's normal
political work he initiated. Nothing to blame him for! There can be
other than technical solutions to the problems that systemd imposed.
Regards, Adrian.
___
Dng mailing list
On 08.11.19 17:13, g4sra via Dng wrote:
> PS: Being Raspberry Pi specific, I do not know why Raspbian does not use
> F2FS, but that does not exclude Devuan from using it.
There are some alternatives to F2FS like UBIFS and a few others. As it
is said thas FS that do wear levelling on their own
Hi Steve
In the DMARC FAQ, Section "Receiver Questions" they say: "If emails from
mailing lists are important to your users, you may therefore consider to
apply specific rules for emails coming from mailing lists." [1] This is
the situation right now with the DNG list: It's up to the people who
Hi Steve
In the DMARC FAQ, Section "Receiver Questions" they say: "If emails from
mailing lists are important to your users, you may therefore consider to
apply specific rules for emails coming from mailing lists." [1] This is
the situation right now with the DNG list: It's up to the people who
On 22.03.20 13:02, Dan Purgert wrote:
> On Mar 21, 2020, Adrian Zaugg wrote:
> The entire point of the public key is that it can be obtained over any
> insecure medium, and still provide the correct signature verification.
That is true, yes. But if you get other keys in your keystore
Hi Dan
On 05.04.20 13:12, Dan Purgert wrote:> OK, so now you've "verified(tm)"
that you successfully got
> "devuan_a1gn1ng_key" from https://devane.com/pgp.asc. Great that you
> were able to verify the server. But you still got a bogus key :)
>
> Which was pretty much my point -- TLS doesn't
Dear Dev1ers
Unfortunately Debian still thinks partionable RAIDs are not worth to
integrate into the installer. Like this it is still hard work to get a
Devuan beowulf on a bootable partionable md raid1 and with UEFI not even
possible according to my tries...
First of all I believe
On 19.03.20 20:37, aitor_czr wrote:
> As you know, you need to install the gpg key of gnuinos:
>
> # curl http://packages.gnuinos.org/gnuinos_pk.asc | apt-key add -
Please get your keys always over secured connections. Use https.
This is also bad in the docs for Devuan:
apt-get
On 02.01.21 15:57, Adrian Zaugg wrote:
> OK, I will start upstreams then.
It is about syncthing relay server (package syncthing-relaysrv).
There is now a Feature Request here:
https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/issues/7254
...and a, hmmm, beta version of the script:
https://ente.limmat
On 01.12.20 15:16, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
> This brings us to the other thing worthy of note. Try sometime to install
> Devuan (not Debian, Devuan) without systemd and you'll be in for a rude
> shock. It's installed by default, and it's a massive pain to eradicate it.
What shows
apt
On 02.12.20 08:44, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Sorry, I feel contrarian today (and many other days too). So there:
>
> http://michael.orlitzky.com/articles/lets_not_encrypt.xhtml
So, then use DANE.
The critics on the CA design I share basically, but his comparison with
tofu of SSH misses the whole
x1 (>= 1.32)
Depends: libssl1.1 (>= 1.1.1)
Depends: libsystemd0
[...]
I see it different on a beowulf system as well as on ascii, you may also
see this in /var/lib/dpkg/status.
Regards, Adrian.
On 10.12.20 11:40, aitor wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On 12/10/20 11:31 AM, aitor wrote:
>>
On 04.12.20 19:43, goli...@devuan.org wrote:
> You might want to have a look at Debian's release schedule:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases
>
Does Devuan not follow the LTS schedule?
https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
Because when Debian Releases X as stable, Devuan needs some time to
On 10.12.20 20:42, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 01:40:39 +0100
> Adrian Zaugg wrote:
>
> Wait a minute. When you say "without GUI", do you mean no X installed,
I just mean no GUI, because with a GUI I don't know exactly. I know
there are some Desktop
On 02.01.21 15:27, Antony Stone wrote:
> I would start by finding out whether any older version of the package (for
> Debian, Ubuntu, or anything else it's previously been packaged for) had such
> a
> script, and it looks like it's been dropped, or whether there never was one
> in
> the
Dear List
Yesterday I installed syncthing-relaysrv, which is missing the init
script for System V based systems. What is the best practice to report
such problem? Open a bug in Devuan, Debian or upstreams?
Thanks, Adrian.
___
Dng mailing list
Hi Budi
It is difficult to help, if you don't write what you exactly donwloaded,
how you tried to install, on what system etc. It is somehow like: "I ate
somethin' for dinner and now I have stomach ache. Please help me!!!" –
what would you answer? Reading that on a mailing list you probably would
Hi Luciano
The script is around as usual, also in Beowulf – so it's not normal, if
you don't have it.
Regards, Adrian.
On 01.02.21 17:35, Luciano Mannucci wrote:
>
> ... Done.
> Seems to work pretty well.
> I've done the classic path: Jessie -> Ascii (checked, everything was
> running) then
In der Nachricht vom Saturday, 6 March 2021 19:16:13 CET schrieb fsmithred via
Dng:
> I could not reproduce the problem on a system that boots legacy bios and
> uses grub-pc.
...my machine where it happened is a Legacy-BIOS-MBR-Installation.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
In der Nachricht vom Tuesday, 9 March 2021 18:40:22 CET schrieb Adrian Zaugg:
> In der Nachricht vom Saturday, 6 March 2021 19:16:13 CET schrieb fsmithred
> via
> Dng:
> > I could not reproduce the problem on a system that boots legacy bios and
> > uses grub-pc.
>
Hi Viverna
In der Nachricht vom Thursday, 4 March 2021 17:22:42 CET schrieb viverna:
> And now the question. Has anyone reported the error in Devuan? Has
> anyone haved this problem?
Yes, it happened on one of my machines too. I did not yet check what really
happened and did not try to solve it
On 05.03.21 05:08, wirelessduck--- via Dng wrote:
> The changelog mentions changes to secure boot. Could that be related to
> the issue?
No, not in my case, secure boot is not in use on the concerned system.
Does anyone see this problem on Debian too (non-bootable after GRUB update)?
Dear List
As far as I can tell, the reported issue on Debian-LTS List is also relevant
for Devuan jessie, ascii and beowulf.
Regards, Adrian.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Upcoming compatibility problem of oldstable (and older) vs.
certificates from Let's Encrypt
Date:
The issue has been recently resolved by the LTS Team, see LTS Advisory
DLA-2761-1 an DLA-2760-1. [1]
Thanks to the LTS Team!
Regards, Adrian.
[1] https://www.debian.org/lts/security/
In der Nachricht vom Thursday, 9 September 2021 17:50:57 CEST schrieb Adrian
Zaugg:
> Dear List
>
&g
Dear list
Beowulf is hit hard by a problem with hardcoded path in grub-efi-amd64-signed
leading to an unbootable system as reported on this list and on dev1galaxy
(manual intervention in certain configurations needed to boot). This problem
also exists on fresh installs of beowulf, as it seems.
In der Nachricht vom Friday, 6 August 2021 03:25:58 CEST steht:
> Which Beowulf iso did you use? I think we fixed this in the 3.1.1
> point-release isos, but you still may hit it on an upgrade.
It happened on upgraded systems.
Thanx for fixing the ISO.
Don't you see a way to prevent the issue
As already mentioned in a side note on this list [1] I believe
vm6.ganeti.dyne.org - the receiving mail server of this list - is not able to
verify DKIM signatures of incoming messages correctly. I checked through the
Mails I kept from the DNG list and found not a single mail with a DKIM
Hi TIA
In der Nachricht vom Sunday, 28 November 2021 14:20:14 CET steht:
> 1. is my splitting the network system into the three parts a good idea or
> should I truncate parts 1 and 2 into the router? If you would please give
> reasons - - - please?
Less devices, less to setup and maintain and
Hi TIA
In der Nachricht vom Saturday, 27 November 2021 16:17:45 CET steht:
> that's needed for an email system. So - - - I'm looking for recommendations
> on what and how to setup an email system. The why you're using what you are
> is vitally important for me (as are my security and privacy).
Hi Alejandro
In der Nachricht vom Wednesday, 5 January 2022 03:03:53 CET schrieb Alejandro
Colomar (man-pages) via Dng:
> So, if the problem is that the rc scripts don't run parallel and don't
> know about exact dependencies from each-other, let's rewrite that part
rc.scripts do run in parallel
Hi Peter
Under normal circumstances an admin does not have to get in touch with the
init system or start-up mechanisms too much: If the job by the package
maintainer is done, it works as intended. In case of non-packaged software,
when a startup-script is missing, it might be a little bit
In der Nachricht vom Monday, 29 November 2021 23:08:33 CET schrieb Adrian
Zaugg:
> Be prepared for a long, long journey setting up an email system with
> SMTP/ IMAP/Webmail using all the goodies SPF/SRS, BATV, DKIM, DNSSEC, TLS
> certs, DANE, virusscanning, anti-spam Measures
Have you tried to start off with a new FF profile? Just for a test, open FF
from console with:
firefox-esr --profile-manager
...then create a new profile and try: It will restore your open windows when
chosen to do so with the new profile.
Regards, Adrian.
In der Nachricht vom
Hi
Has anyone tried to build a FreedomBox [1] image using freedom-maker on
Devuan?
Regards, Adrian.
[1] https://freedombox.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
Hi Brad
In der Nachricht vom Thursday, 7 April 2022 14:58:36 CEST schrieb Brad
Campbell via Dng:
> So, I'm asking for either :
> - Experience in making the in-kernel mechanisms work; or preferably
Updating the BIOS of your Box to the newest version might help here.
Best regards, Adrian.
Hi TIA
In der Nachricht vom Thursday, 2 June 2022 00:16:05 CEST steht:
> My idea was to partition the disks just like normal after the array was
> built. Is that possible?
Yes, it's possible: You may set up a partionable md array. The installer does
not offer partionable arrays, it just offers
Hi
Trying to use hugepages, I fail to create a mountpoint in /dev. It seems it
was never officially solved under Debian SysV according to the the Debian bug
report #572733. At least meanwhile the devs seem to have accepted to use /dev/
hugepages, as can be seen in the systemd mount unit:
In der Nachricht vom Saturday, 25 June 2022 15:32:21 CEST schrieb Marjorie
Roome via Dng:
> (1) Replicate your existing system on the new hardware, maybe with a
> different disk/partition structure from what you have now. And then
> upgrade to Devuan.
This is the easiest method mentioned,
er Nachricht vom Friday, 8 July 2022 21:19:12 CEST steht:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On 8/7/22 15:40, Adrian Zaugg wrote:
> > But I'm failing to write a (e)udev rule, that does the following:
> > if the directory /sys/kernel/mm/hugepages exists,
> > create the directory /dev
It seems here:
https://github.com/skarnet/s6
(linked by: https://skarnet.com/contact/)
Regards, Adrian.
In der Nachricht vom Saturday, 9 July 2022 16:06:13 CEST schrieb
wirelessduck--- via Dng:
> Does anyone know where we can keep track of progress on that project? His
> website hasn’t seen
Hi Aitor
In der Nachricht vom Tuesday, 12 July 2022 01:20:10 CEST steht:
> You can find these files in the subdirectories:
>
> /sys/devices/system/node/node0/hugepages/hugepages-*/
The path you gave is per numa node. It is possible to set different numbers of
hugepages on each numa node. The
42 matches
Mail list logo
