Paul Hoffman writes:
> Greetings again. Those of us who research DNSSEC adoption in the real world
> are being a bit stymied by some of the sign-on-the-fly systems, such as this
> one, apparently from UltraDNS. (Similar results are given for any nonexistent
> name in house.gov, such as
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 08:07:16AM +0100, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
> Off the top of my head, I don't even now how exactly is the escaping
> specified in RFCs.
That's easy, any *non-digit* character can be escaped with a preceding
"\", or alternatively as a 3-digit *decimal* \DDD sequence.
The
On 1/5/21 5:52 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
I brought the issue to this mailing list, instead of to the UltraDNS folks,
because I am using tools that expect host names instead of domain names (in
this case, dig); now I have to write shims around them.
In case it helps you, kdig escapes
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 04:52:07AM +, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> >> ~.anynameyouwans~.house.gov. 882 INNSEC
> >> anynameyouwant!.house.gov. RRSIG NSEC
> >> !~.house.gov. 882 IN NSEC-.house.gov. RRSIG NSEC
> >
> > Consequently, these choices are largely
On Jan 4, 2021, at 7:44 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:39:27AM +, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
>> Greetings again. Those of us who research DNSSEC adoption in the real
>> world are being a bit stymied by some of the sign-on-the-fly systems,
>> such as this one,
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 02:39:27AM +, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings again. Those of us who research DNSSEC adoption in the real
> world are being a bit stymied by some of the sign-on-the-fly systems,
> such as this one, apparently from UltraDNS. (Similar results are given
> for any
Greetings again. Those of us who research DNSSEC adoption in the real world are
being a bit stymied by some of the sign-on-the-fly systems, such as this one,
apparently from UltraDNS. (Similar results are given for any nonexistent name
in house.gov, such as "www1".)
--Paul Hoffman
# dig
Hi Arsen,
On 2021-01-04 09:30, Arsen STASIC wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> * Jerry Lundström [2021-01-04 09:19 (+0100)]:
>> On 2020-12-30 12:42, Arsen STASIC wrote:
>>> Could you please support DNSSEC algorithm Ed25519 (15)?
>>> I think Casey Deccio has already added support for Ed25519. [0]
>
Hi Jerry,
* Jerry Lundström [2021-01-04 09:19 (+0100)]:
On 2020-12-30 12:42, Arsen STASIC wrote:
Could you please support DNSSEC algorithm Ed25519 (15)?
I think Casey Deccio has already added support for Ed25519. [0]
^
[0]
Hi Arsen,
On 2020-12-30 12:42, Arsen STASIC wrote:
> Could you please support DNSSEC algorithm Ed25519 (15)?
> I think Casey Deccio has already added support for Ed25519. [0]
While we (DNS-OARC) host and operate the public instance of DNSViz, the
code is still owned and managed by Casey Deccio
10 matches
Mail list logo
