Re: [dns-operations] [Ext] Re: Browser Public suffixes list

2022-08-29 Thread Meir Kraushar via dns-operations
--- Begin Message --- Hi kim Launching this IDN TLD was actually the first time we created a new TLD (well, besides the cctld we already maintain from long ago). For a small registry like ours, it is something you will probably never practice. So frankly, no one here knew that the PSL ever

Re: [dns-operations] [Ext] Re: Browser Public suffixes list

2022-08-29 Thread Lavie B.B. via dns-operations
--- Begin Message --- Hey Jothan, The OCTO-11 Document is good and important, but is lacking some impotent items such as Browsers and dependent parties. * Browsers - E.G. (Chromium, Firefox) whoch have a good process, Safari / Edge / Samsung which is a patial Enigma or bug reporting process *

Re: [dns-operations] Browser Public suffixes list

2022-08-29 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:25:49PM +, Paul Hoffman wrote a message of 100 lines which said: > There's also, you know, the DNS itself Speaking of DNS, it is time to remind readers that there was a project to express information such as "is it a public suffix?" in the DNS and it

Re: [dns-operations] [Ext] Re: Browser Public suffixes list

2022-08-29 Thread Jothan Frakes
> > I am really frustrated that the materials developed for IANA to share to > > avoid things like this were not distributed, as awareness would have led > to > > earlier request, which in turn would have diminished the propagation > timing > > gap with the browser side. > > I'll confess to being