Re: [dns-operations] Route 53 Unexpected geo location behavior

2023-06-12 Thread Dave Lawrence
Dan McCombs via dns-operations writes: > Ah, yes, so in this case the addresses given back when no edns > subnet is provided are the addresses of servers in eu-west, whereas > with the resolver's own IP (or /24 subnet, or the subnet of clients > querying it) as the edns subnet gets more expected

Re: [dns-operations] Percentage of DoT/DoH requests for public resolvers?

2023-06-12 Thread Geoff Huston
> On 12 Jun 2023, at 10:49 pm, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm looking for the current percentage of encrypted DNS requests > vs. in-the-clear ones on public resolvers having DoT/DoH/DoQ. I do not > find public information about it. May be I searched too fast? > > If you work

Re: [dns-operations] Percentage of DoT/DoH requests for public resolvers?

2023-06-12 Thread Richard T.A. Neal
Hi Stephane, There's also an outstanding feature request to add this to BIND's logs so that BIND administrators can more easily capture and report on this information. The Gitlab ticket is here but it's been a while since I've pestered the good folks at ISC about it!

Re: [dns-operations] (no subject)

2023-06-12 Thread Richard T.A. Neal
Hi Daniel, I also wrote a Beginner’s Guide for DNSSEC using BIND9 here: https://www.talkdns.com/articles/a-beginners-guide-to-dnssec-with-bind-9/ I hope that helps, Richard. From: dns-operations On Behalf Of daniel majela Sent: Monday, June 12, 2023 2:37 PM To:

Re: [dns-operations] Route 53 Unexpected geo location behavior

2023-06-12 Thread Dan McCombs via dns-operations
--- Begin Message --- > > If there is a performance issue with one set of records versus another > (you don't > really say why the differing responses matter in your email), you might > try contacting the nameserver operator directly to discuss the issue. > Ah, yes, so in this case the addresses

Re: [dns-operations] DNSSEC parameter BCP

2023-06-12 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:41:12AM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:37:22AM -0300, daniel majela wrote: > > > What is the best algorithm for ksk and zsk? > > The BCP algorithm is ECDSAP256SHA256(13). This is both more secure and > more compact than RSA. It is in wide

Re: [dns-operations] Percentage of DoT/DoH requests for public resolvers?

2023-06-12 Thread Andrey Meshkov via dns-operations
--- Begin Message --- A lot depends on the resolver as well. In our case the statistics is skewed towards DNS-over-TLS and the reason is that there are a lot of people who configure their Android devices to use AdGuard DNS. If we remove Android devices from the equation, about 30-40% of DNS

Re: [dns-operations] (no subject)

2023-06-12 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:37:22AM -0300, daniel majela wrote: > What is the best algorithm for ksk and zsk? The BCP algorithm is ECDSAP256SHA256(13). This is both more secure and more compact than RSA. It is in wide use: https://stats.dnssec-tools.org/

Re: [dns-operations] Percentage of DoT/DoH requests for public resolvers?

2023-06-12 Thread abang
Hi, >I'm looking for the current percentage of encrypted DNS requests >vs. in-the-clear ones on public resolvers having DoT/DoH/DoQ. I suspect a lot will depend on whether the DoX resolver is used or suggested in popular devices or operating systems or browsers. Winfried

Re: [dns-operations] DNSSEC in BIND

2023-06-12 Thread Petr Špaček
Hello, detailed documentation for DNSSEC in BIND is here: https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dnssec-guide.html If anything is unclear please post questions to BIND mailing list: https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users HTH. Petr Špaček Internet Systems Consortium On 12. 06. 23

Re: [dns-operations] DNSSEC in BIND

2023-06-12 Thread Petr Špaček
Hello, detailed documentation for DNSSEC in BIND is here: https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/latest/dnssec-guide.html If anything is unclear please post questions to BIND mailing list: https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users HTH. Petr Špaček Internet Systems Consortium On 12. 06. 23

[dns-operations] (no subject)

2023-06-12 Thread daniel majela
Hello... My name is Daniel Majela and if possible I would like some help to implement DNNSEC on my servers. Today I have 3 recursive and authoritative servers. My external authoritative zones are copied to 2 DNS servers that are in the DMZ. My first question is if there is a step by step way

Re: [dns-operations] Percentage of DoT/DoH requests for public resolvers?

2023-06-12 Thread Bill Woodcock
> On Jun 12, 2023, at 2:49 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > I'm looking for the current percentage of encrypted DNS requests > vs. in-the-clear ones on public resolvers having DoT/DoH/DoQ. I expect it will be different for each resolver, since they all have fairly distinct user communities,

Re: [dns-operations] Percentage of DoT/DoH requests for public resolvers?

2023-06-12 Thread Peter Thomassen
Hi Stephane, On 6/12/23 08:49, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: I'm looking for the current percentage of encrypted DNS requests vs. in-the-clear ones on public resolvers having DoT/DoH/DoQ. I do not find public information about it. May be I searched too fast? Geoff gave an IEPG presentation in

[dns-operations] Percentage of DoT/DoH requests for public resolvers?

2023-06-12 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
Hello, I'm looking for the current percentage of encrypted DNS requests vs. in-the-clear ones on public resolvers having DoT/DoH/DoQ. I do not find public information about it. May be I searched too fast? If you work for a public DNS resolver, is there data you can share? If you can/want/prefer