Bonjour à tous
Just reassure you that steps have been taken to resolve the problem noted on
the .CI
In fact, we noticed a DNS service stoppage on our Signer DNSSEC server.
>From this observation, we quickly carried out service resumption activities
>and are currently analyzing all the elements
Yes, also notice the same.
I have CC one the people responsible for the .ci in case their is a
takeaway for us.
Best regards,
--
___
Cedrick Adrien Mbeyet
On 23/10/2023 15:50, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:26:46AM +0200,
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote
a message of 4 lines which said:
> .ci has a DS in the root but apparently no longer signs.
>
> https://zonemaster.net/en/result/9d87233d252a8b60
> https://dnsviz.net/d/ci/ZTYEMQ/dnssec/
Now working again:
--- Begin Message ---
I think uptime has high correlation to utility.
p vixie
On Oct 23, 2023 11:39, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 02:02:22PM +,
Carr, Brett via dns-operations wrote
a message of 265 lines which said:
> This may have been mentioned before as I
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 02:02:22PM +,
Carr, Brett via dns-operations wrote
a message of 265 lines which said:
> This may have been mentioned before as I think it has been broken for quite
> some time but:
>
> None of the delegated NS’s for xn--mgbai9azgqp6j (IDN for .pk) seem to be
>
.ci has a DS in the root but apparently no longer signs.
https://zonemaster.net/en/result/9d87233d252a8b60
https://dnsviz.net/d/ci/ZTYEMQ/dnssec/
___
dns-operations mailing list
dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net
