Re: [dns-operations] Lot's of TXT queries from Google

2021-10-07 Thread Arsen STASIC
Hi, just guessing maybe its related to https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/docs/security?hl=en#nonce_prefixes cheers, -arsen * Moritz Müller [2021-10-07 13:50 (+0200)]: Hi, For the second time in a few weeks we noticed a significant increase in queries for NS and TXT records

Re: [dns-operations] validating zones before distribution to secondaries

2021-05-05 Thread Arsen STASIC
* A. Schulze [2021-05-04 23:32 (+0200)]: Am 04.05.21 um 20:53 schrieb Phil Regnauld: On the validation side, take a look at: https://github.com/tobez/validns validns seem to be unmaintained. Build fail with current openssl :/ https://github.com/DENICeG/validns Is a fork

Re: [dns-operations] check DNSSEC RRSIG expiry (anybody awake over at comcast.net?)

2021-02-09 Thread Arsen STASIC
* Viktor Dukhovni [2021-02-09 13:19 (-0500)]: My Perl script (below) just checks that none of the RRSIGs are expiring too soon. If some RRset is not signed at all, that's not detected presently, but should be easy to add. named-compilezone -i local -jD -f raw -o - $zone $db 2>/dev/null |

Re: [dns-operations] dnspooq

2021-02-03 Thread Arsen STASIC
Hi Frank, you could use dig! If you ask dnsmasq for the version string: dig @ip-of-your-network version.bind ch txt +short cheers -arsen * Frank Bulk [2021-02-01 10:29 (-0600)]: Is there a tool that would allow me to identify all the DNS servers on our networks that are using dnsmasq?

Re: [dns-operations] DNSViz please support DNSSEC algorithm Ed25519 (15)

2021-01-27 Thread Arsen STASIC
Hi Matt, * Matthew Pounsett [2021-01-19 14:59 (-0500)]: On Dec 30, 2020, at 06:42, Arsen STASIC wrote: Dear DNS-OARC, Could you please support DNSSEC algorithm Ed25519 (15)? I think Casey Deccio has already added support for Ed25519. [0] Hi Arsen. First, it’s generally better to address

Re: [dns-operations] DNSViz please support DNSSEC algorithm Ed25519 (15)

2021-01-04 Thread Arsen STASIC
Hi Jerry, * Jerry Lundström [2021-01-04 09:19 (+0100)]: On 2020-12-30 12:42, Arsen STASIC wrote: Could you please support DNSSEC algorithm Ed25519 (15)? I think Casey Deccio has already added support for Ed25519. [0] ^ [0] https://github.com

[dns-operations] DNSViz please support DNSSEC algorithm Ed25519 (15)

2020-12-30 Thread Arsen STASIC
Dear DNS-OARC, Could you please support DNSSEC algorithm Ed25519 (15)? I think Casey Deccio has already added support for Ed25519. [0] RFC 8624 lists Ed25519 as RECOMMENDED [1]. Verisign's dnssec-analyzer already supports DNSSEC algorithm Ed25519 (15) [2]. It would be really handy to have a

Re: [dns-operations] How widely implemented are different DNSSEC algorithms?

2020-09-13 Thread Arsen STASIC
* John Levine [2020-09-11 14:29 (-0400)]: Are there any published numbers estimating how well the various DNSSEC algorithms are supported in DNS caches and client software? Or to put it another way, were I to switch from signing with algorithm 8 to 13, how much would I regret it? Geoff

Re: [dns-operations] DNSViz Status?

2020-02-19 Thread Arsen STASIC
Hi Casey, * Casey Deccio [2020-02-18 15:54 (-0700)]: On Feb 17, 2020, at 1:37 AM, Marco Davids (Private) via dns-operations wrote: Op 14-02-2020 om 16:09 schreef Vladimír Čunát: For me personally, the old historical data isn't much interesting. What I'm missing most is the feature of

[dns-operations] DNSViz Status?

2020-02-14 Thread Arsen STASIC
Dear DNS-OARC, What is the status of DNSViz's historical data import job? cheers arsen ___ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations

Re: [dns-operations] validation problem on 1.1.1.1

2020-02-05 Thread Arsen STASIC
* Vicky Shrestha [2020-02-04 12:57 (-0800)]: Hi, We have identified the bug in a new version that was released to a subset of colos. We have rolled out a fix. how does it look now from your vantage point? It seems to be fixed from my vantage point. -arsen

Re: [dns-operations] Check DNS-anycast-instances for same DNS Cookie

2020-01-27 Thread Arsen STASIC
* Mark Andrews [2020-01-25 08:56 (+1100)]: On 24 Jan 2020, at 21:36, Arsen STASIC wrote: This software might be of interest for DNS anycast providers (or customers) which are running BIND. With BIND 9.11 and newer DNS Cookies are enabled **automatically**. You seem surprised? DNS COOKIE

Re: [dns-operations] Check DNS-anycast-instances for same DNS Cookie

2020-01-24 Thread Arsen STASIC
Just a short follow up on this. Out of 4134 unique NS entries in the Root-Zone 1103 NS have DNS Cookies enabled (~26%). (I don't know how many among them are anycasted or load-balanced.) Among these NS with DNS Cookies enabled are big TLDs like: uk, de, fr, br, pl, nl, it Find below the

[dns-operations] Check DNS-anycast-instances for same DNS Cookie

2020-01-24 Thread Arsen STASIC
Hi, This software might be of interest for DNS anycast providers (or customers) which are running BIND. With BIND 9.11 and newer DNS Cookies are enabled **automatically**. While I was searching for software to check DNS Cookies and I didn't find anything. Therefore I wrote this small Perl

Re: [dns-operations] glitch on [ip6|in-addr].arpa?

2019-10-11 Thread Arsen STASIC
* Viktor Dukhovni [2019-10-10 20:51 (-0400)]: On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 06:25:41PM -0400, Matthew Pounsett wrote: The speculation I've seen is that Cogent refuses to treat HE as a Tier1 network in v6 because they don't try to also be one in v4, but that they should because HE's v6 network is