Re: [dns-operations] QTYPEs 65 and 65479

2020-10-01 Thread Jeroen Massar via dns-operations
--- Begin Message --- > On 20201001, at 16:59, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:44:00AM +0100, > Roy Arends wrote > a message of 128 lines which said: > >> More info: >> >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/MbOOWPVHRHM_wvbKhfHuzUTwimI/ >>

Re: [dns-operations] QTYPEs 65 and 65479

2020-10-01 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:44:00AM +0100, Roy Arends wrote a message of 128 lines which said: > More info: > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/MbOOWPVHRHM_wvbKhfHuzUTwimI/ > And a good Cloudflare paper

Re: [dns-operations] QTYPEs 65 and 65479

2020-09-16 Thread Roy Arends
More info: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/MbOOWPVHRHM_wvbKhfHuzUTwimI/ Roy > On 16 Sep 2020, at 09:04, Greg Choules via dns-operations > wrote: > > > From: Greg Choules > Subject: QTYPEs 65 and 65479 >

Re: [dns-operations] QTYPEs 65 and 65479

2020-09-16 Thread Vladimír Čunát
65 is the upcoming "HTTPS" RR, so perhaps testing future browser features or something. https://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/dns-parameters.xhtml (The other one is in "private use" range and I don't recognize it off the top of my head.) ___

Re: [dns-operations] QTYPEs 65 and 65479

2020-09-16 Thread Roy Arends
For qtype 65: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/00/?include_text=1 These types are not special. Resolvers should treat them as “unknown RRs” and just resolve them. Roy > On 16 Sep

Re: [dns-operations] QTYPEs 65 and 65479

2020-09-16 Thread Petr Špaček
On 16. 09. 20 10:04, Greg Choules via dns-operations wrote:> Recently, whilst looking for something else, tcpdump on one of our recursive servers showed we are receiving queries with (from its point of view) unrecognised types. Wireshark doesn't have a decode for them yet either. There aren't