On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:40:56PM +0200,
Raffaele Sommese wrote
a message of 35 lines which said:
> registries do not enforce the consistency between glue records and
> the same records served by the authoritative nameservers, right?
Some do, some don't. That's the beauty of the Internet:-)
On Monday, 20 April 2020 12:51:15 UTC Vladimír Čunát wrote:
> ...
>
> As noted, these records are not required but are in bailiwick of .com,
> so it's reasonable to trust their value and speed up resolution that
> way. I believe there's nothing CloudFlare-specific in there. (For
> example, Knot
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 13:50, Tony Finch wrote:
> Different registries have different rules about glue records. Some require
> glue addresses for any nameserver that is a subdomain of the registry
> (.com in this case), not just for in-bailiwick delegations.
>
> I call this "sibling glue". There
On 4/20/20 12:24 PM, Raffaele Sommese wrote:
> So, why these records are in the .com authoritative server? Is it
> optimization for Cloudflare?
Let me add resolver point of view.
As noted, these records are not required but are in bailiwick of .com,
so it's reasonable to trust their value and
Raffaele Sommese wrote:
>
> Rose and Rick are not in-bailiwick records required for the resolution
> of cloudflare.com (that use ns3-ns7.cloudflare.com as authoritative
> NS).
>
> So, why these records are in the .com authoritative server?
Different registries have different rules about glue
