Late to the party, as usual.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:00:45AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
official list from IANA, and if you feel like arguing with them,
here's the ISO list to shut you up. :)
It's worth noting that, unlike IANA's decision many years ago to use
an external authority (ISO's
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 06:55:44PM -0400,
.CW Registry Curacao regis...@una.net wrote
a message of 187 lines which said:
We need some help with getting our ccTLD registered worldwide.
You're in the news :-)
: Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD
tables/databases ...
Mr. Pengel,
Is there a way for people interested in debugging this problem to get a .CW
email address. I wonder if there is any free webmail provider in the island, or
if your organization could provide a few
At 07:54 22-01-2013, .CW Registry Curacao wrote:
Please find attached the history of some conversations (between my
colleague Jeffrey) with Google support.
The problem is not related to email or DNS. It related to the
web. It may be easier to contact web folks who can fix it.
Regards,
-sm
Dear -SM,
Thanks for your follow-up.
We are working on it!
Rgds,
--Original Message--
From: SM
To: .CW Registry Curacao
Cc: dns-operati...@mail.dns-oarc.net
Subject: Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD
tables/databases ...
Sent: Jan 22, 2013 1:52 PM
At 07:54
And you wonder why IDNs are not more mainstream... look no further.
From the end user POV - domain names that you can't use for E-mail or
in web forms are as useful as a parachute with holes in it.
On 22-01-2013 22:47, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 12:52 PM, SM s...@resistor.net
Agree, but anyways checking suffixes is a bizarre and broken way of
validating an email. Just because a suffix exists it doesn't mean that
the domain exists, and if a domain doesn't exist because the TLD is
wrong or the 2nd level, or the 3rd level labels are wrong, the net
effect on the
Hi,
On Jan 21, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Jaap Akkerhuis j...@nlnetlabs.nl wrote:
ISO-3166-1 table which shows valid ccTLDs in green:
http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/country_codes/iso-3166-1_decoding_table.htm
Yellow (exceptionally reserved) code elements used for ccTLDs
are also considered
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, RijilV wrote:
My experience is many people use Mozilla's public suffix list for allowing
folks to create resources on their app services.
I was going to suggest that. However bear in mind that this isn't really a
TLD list. What it is is a list of domains that Mozilla won't
On 2013-01-21, at 11:55, .CW Registry Curacao regis...@una.net wrote:
I am not sure this is an issue that you can do anything about, however we
have been advised by our colleagues from the ccNSO (ICANN) to send you this
email message.
We need some help with getting our ccTLD registered
A nit:
On Jan 20, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
ISO-3166-1 table which shows valid ccTLDs in green:
http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/country_codes/iso-3166-1_decoding_table.htm
Yellow (exceptionally reserved) code elements used for ccTLDs are also
considered
, January 20, 2013 6:36 PM
To: .CW Registry Curacao
Cc: dns-operati...@mail.dns-oarc.net
Subject: Re: [dns-operations] getting .CW recognised in the Google ccTLD
tables/databases ...
snip
This is an uphill battle which is only going to get steeper when the
next round of new TLDs is released
12 matches
Mail list logo
