Re: [dns-operations] glitch on [ip6|in-addr].arpa?
> On Oct 16, 2019, at 7:41 AM, Paul Vixie wrote: > > hurricane and cogent are also businesses, each having employees and investors > and customers. they are each doing what makes sense to them. this is not a > "peering war" by any stretch of the vocabulary. cogent does not have a > completely open peering policy, and while hurricane has transit for its ipv4 > network, it lacks transit for its ipv6 network. I'm unaware of any network that discriminates based on AFI for transit so this fails to pass the laugh test. > their networks, their rules. I get this mantra, it applies in many cases but as per the above, it's poor behavior that harms us all. ___ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
Re: [dns-operations] glitch on [ip6|in-addr].arpa?
a late followup. Rubens Kuhl wrote on 2019-10-12 13:50: ... If someone from Cogent is reading, that's their opportunity to step up and provide at least a partial feed to OARC. i'm part of the cogent c-root team, and i was a co-founder of dns-oarc. we have hosted elements of the dns-oarc project at cogent before, and we are working with the dns-oarc engineering team to make our ipv6-addressed c-root server visible to their measurement systems. Unless they want to do the better thing which is to end this peering war and stop messing IPv6 Internet... when i succeeded dave rand as cto of abovenet in Y2K or so, we had a completely open peering policy -- we even peered with customers, if they wanted a second BGP connection so they didn't have to pay by bit-volume when exchange traffic with our other customers. this made business sense to the company and its employees and investors and customers. hurricane and cogent are also businesses, each having employees and investors and customers. they are each doing what makes sense to them. this is not a "peering war" by any stretch of the vocabulary. cogent does not have a completely open peering policy, and while hurricane has transit for its ipv4 network, it lacks transit for its ipv6 network. their networks, their rules. -- P Vixie ___ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
[dns-operations] FOSDEM 2020 DNS Developer Room Call for Participation
Hello DNS Operations! tl;dr Please consider submitting a presentation for the DNS devroom at FOSDEM 2020. More details: Every year, developers from all over Europe (and some from farther away) meet in Brussels to discuss Open Source software and many other topics. After a successful and packed DNS devroom (track) at FOSDEM 2018 and 2019, we are happy to announce a half-day DNS devroom at FOSDEM 2020. As with the last years, we hope to host talks anywhere from hardcore protocol stuff, to practical sessions for programmers that are not directly involved with DNS but may have to deal with DNS in their day to day coding or system administrators responsible for DNS infrastructure. We have been allotted a room on Saturday 1 February 2020. We expect to schedule 30 minutes per talk, including questions, but if you need more or less time, we can discuss this. If you have something you’d like to share with your fellow developers, please head to pentabarf at https://penta.fosdem.org/submission/FOSDEM20. Examples of topics are measuring, monitoring, DNS libraries, anecdotes on how you’ve (ab)used the DNS, and group discussions of upcoming technologies. Here’s the 2019 schedule, for your inspiration: https://archive.fosdem.org/2019/schedule/track/dns/ . The deadline for submission is December 1st 2019. If you have a FOSDEM pentabarf account from a previous year, please use that account. Reach out to dns-devroom-mana...@fosdem.org if you run into any trouble. See you there! Cheers, The FOSDEM 2020 DNS Devroom organizers P.S. Apologies to those receiving multiple copies of these emails. ___ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
