Re: [dns-operations] Looking for contact at integraonline.com / allstream.net
Thanks Viktor for the suggestion, but I am afraid this is going nowhere. If anyone body else has contacts there, or has a way to point them to https://github.com/dns-violations/dns-violations/issues/75, that would be much appreciated! Frank > On Mar 24, 2021, at 9:10 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 08:34:36AM +0100, Frank Louwers wrote: > >> I am looking for a DNS contact at integraonline.com / allstream.net. I >> tried hostmas...@integraonline.com, but haven't received any replies >> yet. > > Their Twitter account summmary is: > >Your trusted business communications partner >Voice and collaboration | Connectivity | Managed IT >US 1-866-468-3472 Canada 1-888-288-2273 >Support| @Allstream_Care > > And they seem to have unrestricted direct-messaging enabled, > so you could try that route. > > -- >Viktor. > ___ > dns-operations mailing list > dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations ___ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
Re: [dns-operations] Looking for contact at integraonline.com / allstream.net
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 08:34:36AM +0100, Frank Louwers wrote: > I am looking for a DNS contact at integraonline.com / allstream.net. I > tried hostmas...@integraonline.com, but haven't received any replies > yet. Their Twitter account summmary is: Your trusted business communications partner Voice and collaboration | Connectivity | Managed IT US 1-866-468-3472 Canada 1-888-288-2273 Support| @Allstream_Care And they seem to have unrestricted direct-messaging enabled, so you could try that route. -- Viktor. ___ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
[dns-operations] Looking for contact at integraonline.com / allstream.net
Hi, I am looking for a DNS contact at integraonline.com / allstream.net. I tried hostmas...@integraonline.com, but haven't received any replies yet. Problem is as follows: It replies with the correct aa=1 bit when dnssec is enabled. ❯ dig ns2.business.allstream.net @ns.integraonline.com. +norec | grep flags ;; flags: qr ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 1 ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 vs ❯ dig ns2.business.allstream.net @ns.integraonline.com. +norec +dnssec | grep flags ;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 1 ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 If anyone can forward this message or get me in touch with them, please do so. I am aware of at least one dns resolver (PowerDNS) which refuses to accept these RFC violating answers. A customer of mine operates a resolving DNS network with a large customer base in Canada, so they are impacted by this. Kind Regards, Frank ___ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
