On Tue 2015-11-03 21:54:27 +0900, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> During the meeting on Monday, it was obvious the Working Group wanted to
> make this an official EDNS option. We reached out to the author and
> while he is traveling for an extended period of time, he is happy to
> work on edits (with a
Hi
I reviewed the draft and here are a few comments:
“The PADDING octects MUST be set to 0x00. If a Responder detects non-
0x00 octects in the padding of a query, a FORMERR (RCODE=1) MUST be
returned.”
è Is MUST necessary here? There might be existing responders that may be
agnostic to
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the DNS PRIVate Exchange Working Group of the
IETF.
Title : The EDNS(0) Padding Option
Author : Alexander Mayrhofer
Filename:
I've submitted a -00 WG version of the draft, which is now pending WG Chairs
approval.
Hope I got everything right, since the draft was edited from a phone onboard a
ferry with crappy wifi and while coloring a pirates book with a 3yo ;-)
Alex
Tim Wicinski schrieb
>
>During the
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-34715872
The bill will force companies to hold "internet connection records"
for 12 months so they can be requested by authorities.
Such data would consist of a basic domain address,
___
dns-privacy mailing list
Hi Tim,
On 3 Nov 2015, at 7:54, Tim Wicinski wrote:
During the meeting on Monday, it was obvious the Working Group wanted
to make this an official EDNS option. We reached out to the author
and while he is traveling for an extended period of time, he is happy
to work on edits (with a small
