A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the DNS PRIVate Exchange of the IETF.
Title : Specification for DNS over TLS
Authors : Zi Hu
Liang Zhu
The IESG has received a request from the DNS PRIVate Exchange WG (dprive)
to consider the following document:
- 'Specification for DNS over TLS'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive
Thanks for the quick and clear responses!
So, and I emphasize "not a blocking comment", it sounds like this isn't an
RFC 2119 requirement for interoperability, but just good advice?
If so, this is more like "There is no specific requirement for the value of
PADDING bytes, and receivers MUST
Shane's explanation on padding is a great summary of the mailing list
discussion during the document review.
tim
(as DocumentShepherd)
On 3/1/16 5:39 AM, Shane Kerr wrote:
Spencer,
At 2016-02-29 20:38:34 -0800
"Spencer Dawkins" wrote:
Thanks for producing
Spencer,
At 2016-02-29 20:38:34 -0800
"Spencer Dawkins" wrote:
> Thanks for producing this draft. I do have one question about this text:
>
>The PADDING octets SHOULD be set to 0x00. Other values MAY be used;
>for example, in cases where there is a
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dprive-edns0-padding-02: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please