On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:58:19AM +, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Hugo,
>
> I'm curious what you mean by this. Do you really mean to propose an
> option to pad every query and response message to 65K bytes? I guess I
> don't object it for the sake of completion, but it seems a bit crazy.
>
> OTOH,
Shane Kerr wrote:
>
> I'm curious what you mean by this. Do you really mean to propose an
> option to pad every query and response message to 65K bytes?
Reasonable values might be the MTU or the EDNS buffer size.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch
Paul,
At 2017-07-06 18:09:51 -0700
"Paul Hoffman" wrote:
> On 3 Jul 2017, at 14:29, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:
>
> > i've updated the Padding Policy draft - the main change is the
> > inclusion of an actual recommendation, essentially a blunt copy of
> > Daniel's