Hi, here are comments I mistakenly sent to a thread about another dprive
last call. Summary: the section about "DoH Specific Considerations" is
highly questionable, and seems like advocacy rather than a representation
of IETF consensus.
Hi,
I found two issues with [this draft]. The
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:00:45PM +, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hiya,
>
> On 18/12/2019 13:45, Sara Dickinson wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 29 Nov 2019, at 15:39, Stephen Farrell via Datatracker
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Reviewer: Stephen Farrell
> >> Review result: Ready
> >
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
I agree with Patrick's comment that the folks from DNScrypt should be the
ones giving us the
guidance here.
Tim
(wearing the hat today, so Warren doesn't have to)
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 1:01 PM Patrick Mevzek
wrote:
> On 23/12/2019 12:54, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> > W
> > p.s: if it were mine,
On 23/12/2019 12:54, Warren Kumari wrote:
> W
> p.s: if it were mine, I'd probably mark it hold for update with a note
> of "someone should validate this..."
In May 2018, I also reported that the correct one was probably more the
..info one than the .org one, because at that time both
