Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] next steps for draft-opportunistic-adotq

2021-03-22 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Mar 22, 2021, at 1:59 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > I think that makes sense with one caveat: I don't interpret > these changes as representing a consensus to not use TLSA - I > think such a decision is still down the road some, after we > have some better ideas as to the practicality or

Re: [dns-privacy] next steps for draft-opportunistic-adotq

2021-03-22 Thread Stephen Farrell
Hiya, I think that makes sense with one caveat: I don't interpret these changes as representing a consensus to not use TLSA - I think such a decision is still down the road some, after we have some better ideas as to the practicality or otherwise of the various approaches one might adopt. I

[dns-privacy] next steps for draft-opportunistic-adotq

2021-03-22 Thread Peter van Dijk
Hello DPRIVE, First, a recap of my IETF110 presentation for those who missed it. I explained that the recent version of our opportunistic/unauthenticated draft (draft-ietf-dprive-opportunistic-adotq-01) included a rough skeleton of support for an authenticated use case, because no other proposal