Re: [dns-privacy] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8932 (6629)

2021-07-06 Thread Paul Wouters
On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, Peter van Dijk wrote: On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 09:33 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: Perhaps instead of ephemeral/non-ephemeral, a fix would be: One example would be to replace all TCP/UDP port numbers with one of two fixed values indicating whether the

Re: [dns-privacy] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8932 (6629)

2021-07-06 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Mon, 2021-07-05 at 09:33 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > Perhaps instead of ephemeral/non-ephemeral, a fix would be: > > One example would be to replace all TCP/UDP port > numbers with one of two fixed values indicating whether the > original port was a system port (<=1024)