Re: [dns-privacy] ADoX experiments (was: Re: Intermediate proposal (what I was saying at the mic))

2021-08-31 Thread Bill Woodcock
> On Aug 31, 2021, at 2:23 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote: > > On 8/17/21 8:16 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: >> I believe we need the following: >> >> 3. At least one authoritative server operator willing to deploy the >> experimental implementation, >> >> 4. At least one recursive resolver operator

Re: [dns-privacy] ADoX experiments (was: Re: Intermediate proposal (what I was saying at the mic))

2021-08-31 Thread Bill Woodcock
On 8/17/21 8:16 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: > I believe we need the following: > > 3. At least one authoritative server operator willing to deploy the > experimental implementation, > > 4. At least one recursive resolver operator willing to deploy the > experimental implementation, > > Are there

Re: [dns-privacy] ADoX experiments (was: Re: Intermediate proposal (what I was saying at the mic))

2021-08-31 Thread Brian Haberman
Any other volunteers? On 8/17/21 8:16 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: > All, > I want to start working through the details of what Stephen is > proposing below; beginning to do operational experiments to determine > which approach, or approaches, may be viable in the long term. To carry > out such

Re: [dns-privacy] scope of authoritative signalling [Was: Re: [Ext] Intermediate proposal (what I was saying at the mic)]

2021-08-31 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 19:05 -0700, Brian Dickson wrote: > If "foo.example" uses "NS ns1.dot-only.example.net", a query for > www.foo.example on port 53 can reasonably expect to get "REFUSED". This is not currently reasonable. If you want that to be reasonable, you have a bunch of RFCs to