I'm fine with all those decisions.
On 6/23/23, 8:50 PM, "Paul Hoffman" mailto:paul.hoff...@icann.org>> wrote:
Belated thanks for this review. I've accepted many of the nits without note,
but some notes below.
--Paul Hoffman
On Jun 9, 2023, at 1:20 PM, Rich Salz via Datatracker
He apologizes for his lack of Geography. (or he should)
My excuse: I am a typical American, ignorant of the rest of the world :)
___
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
separate the domains with ALPN. I don't believe
that either the IP ACL or mTLS addresses this issue, and in fact arguably mTLS
makes the problem worse because it provides authenticated protocol traces which
might be usable for cross-protocol attacks.
-Ekr
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:26 AM Salz, R
>No new protocol should use TLS without ALPN. It only opens space for
> cross-protocol attacks. Did the working group consider this possibility in
> their discussions?
I don't believe that message has been made as public as it should be.
___
