On Sun, 2020-11-15 at 16:52 +, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Thanks for the response! I hope that there is more list discussion before the
> WG meeting this week.
>
> On Nov 15, 2020, at 5:52 AM, Peter van Dijk
> wrote:
> > The cost of port checking is not low.
>
> We disagree in the general
Thanks for the response! I hope that there is more list discussion before the
WG meeting this week.
On Nov 15, 2020, at 5:52 AM, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 15:04 +, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> It would be useful if a resolver could tell in advance, and at a cost less
>>
On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 15:04 +, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> It would be useful if a resolver could tell in advance, and at a cost less
> than port-checking. There could be a new protocols developed to do that. I
> don't see this as a requirement, though, given the low cost of port-checking.
The
On Nov 4, 2020, at 12:42 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 02:54:13PM -0800,
> internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote
> a message of 43 lines which said:
>
>>Title : DNS Privacy Requirements for Exchanges between
>> Recursive Resolvers and Authoritative
On Nov 4, 2020, at 12:29 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 02:54:13PM -0800,
> internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote
> a message of 43 lines which said:
>
>>Title : DNS Privacy Requirements for Exchanges between
>> Recursive Resolvers and Authoritative
