Hello Paul,
On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 15:29 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> > please find below revision -01 of our proposal for enabling DoT from
> > resolver to authoritative.
>
> DoT can be enabled regardless. This draft is not about enabling DoT.
I
Hi Duane,
On Tue, 2020-07-14 at 22:13 +, Wessels, Duane wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> While I remain neutral as to whether or not ds-dot-signal-and-pin is a good
> idea overall, you can count me as one that thinks flags=257 is a bad idea. I
> don't think anything in 403[345] say that flags can
Hi Peter,
While I remain neutral as to whether or not ds-dot-signal-and-pin is a good
idea overall, you can count me as one that thinks flags=257 is a bad idea. I
don't think anything in 403[345] say that flags can be interpreted differently
depending on the algorithm or on the value of the
Hello,
please find below revision -01 of our proposal for enabling DoT from
resolver to authoritative.
New in this revision:
* a lot of clarifying text without changing the underlying protocol
* the DNSKEY flags field is now specified to be 257 instead of 0. We
know that this goes against the
