Dan,
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:07:54 -0700
Dan Wing wrote:
> On 05-Oct-2015 03:48 pm, Ted Hardie wrote:
> > That said, the shim layer proposal seems at first glance to a
> > pretty simple extension of the multiplexing mechanics already
> > described. That
On 05-Oct-2015 03:48 pm, Ted Hardie wrote:
> That said, the shim layer proposal seems at first glance to a pretty simple
> extension of the multiplexing mechanics already described. That is, you have
> the QueryID to allow you to interleave requests; you use that in
>