Re: [dns-privacy] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04

Thanks everyone for their feedback. I've now changed the document flow according to the NEW structure outlined above, and will publish a -05 shortly. best, Alex On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 2:18 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2018-04-12 10:11:34 +0200, Alexander

Re: [dns-privacy] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04

On Thu 2018-04-12 10:11:34 +0200, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote: > I think it totally depends on the viewpoint (operational vs. > "research-oriented"). Please share your preferred option - keep with > CURRENT or restructure for NEW. I prefer NEW (i like having the recommendation up front) but would

Re: [dns-privacy] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04

Alexander Mayrhofer writes: > I think it totally depends on the viewpoint (operational vs. > "research-oriented"). Please share your preferred option - keep with > CURRENT or restructure for NEW. I prefer the NEW option of putting the recommendation before the discussion of other possibilities.

Re: [dns-privacy] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04

> On 12 Apr 2018, at 09:50, Shane Kerr wrote: > > Alex, > > I think that the new way probably makes slightly more sense. > > So I prefer the NEW order. +1 for the NEW order although I might suggest calling Section 4.2 something like “Other Strategies Evaluated"

Re: [dns-privacy] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04

Alex, I think that the new way probably makes slightly more sense. So I prefer the NEW order. Cheers, -- Shane Alexander Mayrhofer: > All, > > the OPSDIR review from Joe Clarke suggests a re-ordering of the > document flow in order to better appeal to folks with operational > background. I'm

Re: [dns-privacy] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04

All, the OPSDIR review from Joe Clarke suggests a re-ordering of the document flow in order to better appeal to folks with operational background. I'm considering changing the structure of the document, but i would appreciate yes/no indications from the group before i proceed. This would not

[dns-privacy] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04

Reviewer: Joe Clarke Review result: Has Nits I have been asked to review this document on behalf of the ops directorate. This document is intended for experimental status, and describes a number of strategies to take when performing EDNS(0) padding. It recommends one (experimental) option to