Hi, There seem to have been issues with "problem statements". My two cents.
"Fix the Internet w.r.t pervasive monitoring" will not lead, in 'reasonable' time, to concrete standards. Instead, groups are formed with a charter, including a limited scope of field for consideration. Other scopes can be created and new working groups formed should no consensus be reached, or even if the reached consensus proves to be insufficient, unimplementable etc.. The IETF has, with its working methods, shepherded one of the greatest constructs that homo sapiens sapiens has manufactured. Yes, processes need review, but that may be an *even longer* discussion than "Fix the Internet ...". (No problem there, but process modification is outside the scope of DPRIVE :) This WG seems to be consolidating around a limited number of solutions to the stub-to-recursive resolver challenge, for which I am glad. Let's focus on the problem space and see what can be created. With respect, Hugo Connery _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
